On 17/09/2012 12:35, Matt Doidge wrote:
> IIRC the "needy" tarballs sites are IC, Lancaster, and ECDF. I recall
> QMUL having some tarball resources but I could have imagined that. Is
> that all the tarballers?
Liverpool is a potential tarballer. We've used them in the past on the
University's shared cluster, and there's a new cluster going into action
which we have a share on. That share is likely to be a mix of dedicated
resources (which shouldn't need tarballs) and shared (which may), so we
have an interest in them being available and up to date.
Rob
|