Stephen Jones [mailto:[log in to unmask]] said:
> That's the can of worms. One way to put the lid back on is to use both
> the pattern and the CIC FQANs (where they don't conflict). At least
> that way the VO gets what it bargains for, and if the VO gets it wrong
> then it ends up with a viable set of FQANs anyway (via the pattern).
There's another aspect to it - this is about mapping FQANs to unix groups, but it will only mean anything if the scheduler treats the groups as different in some way. Assuming that most sites use PBS/maui, what's the default configuration of the fairshares? If every VO user is treated equally regardless of group then the group mapping will be irrelevant. (For sgm jobs you ideally want a high priority but a low limit on the number of running jobs - is that a default, or documented somewhere?)
Stephen
--
Scanned by iCritical.
|