JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM  August 2012

CRISIS-FORUM August 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Pussy Riot > climate change and activism

From:

"North, Peter" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

North, Peter

Date:

Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:04:00 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (59 lines)

at the risk of shameless self promotion  those of you on this list with access to academic articles might find this paper of interest on the issue of effective social movements in the context of climate change.  If you can't get it and have a genuine interest get back to me and I'll send you a pdf

North, P: (2011): “The politics of climate activism in the UK: a social movement analysis”, in Environment and Planning A, vol 43/7 pp 1581-1598.

Abstract. This paper uses social movement theory (SMT) as a theoretical ‘gymnasium’ to explore the limits and possibilities of climate activism in the UK. The core SMT concepts are used to explore why climate activism emerged when it did, and how conceptions of there being a problem were translated into arguments about what should be done. If something should be done, is contentious politics or policy change the most appropriate strategy? At what scale should action take place: a local politics of prefiguration, through direct action, or in more visible mass mobilisations? It is argued that climate activism takes place in a diverse range of political spaces and scales and works actively to produce knowledges about the dangers of anthropogenic climate change and responsibilities for it, but it is unclear that it has the motive power to move to more sustainable ways of organising human society. 

http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=a43534

Peter North
Department of Geography
School for Environmental Sciences
University of Liverpool
0151 794 2849

Building the Low Carbon Economy on Merseyside

www.lowcarbonliverpool.com

www.liv.ac.uk/geography/research/lowcarboneconomy/index.htm

Local Money

http://greenbooks.co.uk/store/local-money-p-320.html?osCsid=53cafffb104745d08678d499c824626e

________________________________________
From: Discussion list for the Crisis Forum [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Mandy Meikle [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 21 August 2012 21:56
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: The Liberation Theology of Pussy Riot's Trial Statements

Thanks Alastair, interesting debate. One debater says that mass participation is the first ingredient & quotes a political scientist who said, “when more than 5 per cent of the population engages in sustained, coordinated civil disobedience, few governments — dictatorships or democracies — remain in power.” So if the UK has 60m people, we need 3m people to be engaged in sustained, coordinated civil disobedience.

Official figures, which will be underestimate, say 1m marched in 2003 against Iraq war. Although one of the biggest mass demonstrations in the UK in recent years, it was a one-off event with an obvious cause yet less than half the number required to topple governments took part.

‘Coordinated’ is key here too. The Occupy movement lacked aims which the majority could grasp. After visiting Occupy Edinburgh, I asked ‘What would the slogan be?’ (http://mandymeikle.wordpress.com/2011/10/23/what-would-the-slogan-be/) and I still don’t know!

Mandy

____________________

http://mandymeikle.wordpress.com/
@powerdowngirl

From: Alastair McIntosh
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 7:46 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: The Liberation Theology of Pussy Riot's Trial Statements


I would agree that Pussy Riot does not reflect wider Russian society’s values … at least, not until your study the theology behind what they are saying, which is why I am drawing attention to their trial closing statements. I don’t think those statements would give very much comfort to the American right whose religion prefers to set up the divine underpinning of reality in its own image. My Thought for the Day broadcast on this from this morning can be read here.



Also, can I draw folks’ attention to a series of good short debates on Protest sparked by the Tea Party, Occupy and Pussy Riot on the New York Times website here. What I like about these debates is that they are on-side with the need for social change, but taking a critical look at where the notion of protesting is at in terms of effective political shift. I am particularly struck by the deepening that is going on just now worldwide in terms of the power of nonviolence. It is a field that pushes people into their values/spirituality, and that is where deep transformation comes from. A slight regret with my TfD piece this morning is that to prevent listeners from choking over their cornflakes and to keep within the time limit, I had to slightly contract the final Pussy Riot quote: ‘People can sense the truth. Truth really does have some kind of … superiority over lies and this is written in the Bible.’ The words omitted (in the ellipsis) were: “some kind of ontological, existential superiority over lies”. You see, that’s the core issue: the crisis of our times is about the existential expressions of ontology (i.e. the study and theory of being, thus, metaphysics as applied to the human person).



A.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2022
May 2018
January 2018
September 2016
May 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
September 2015
August 2015
May 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
July 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager