Many good points, thanks.
Brian
On 30 Jul 2012, at 14:22, Lawrence Serewicz wrote:
Dear All,
I realize that I am coming to this discussion late but I wanted to add my experience.
First, I agree with the trust issue. Many people record because they no longer trust the organisation. To mitigate these situations, I follow up the conversation with a written summary. Often, the applicant has had a previous experience where that was not the case (for any number of reasons) and the discrepancy is not explained. As a result of the gap, between expectation and reality, the trust starts to fade.
Second, recording for academic or other purposes (aside from personal use) will be covered by specific professional ethics. In general, for most public sector people, the Nolan Principles will need to be considered.
Third, talk is cheap. What is written often carries more evidential weight. In a conversation, what we say is modified by what the other party says. Written language is fixed. We see the difference between a conversation (fluid and nuanced) and an email exchange. In speaking we will modify our arguments, our points, and most of all our own language through repetition and revision.
If you want to see trust and whether someone is willing to do as they say, then ask them to put it in writing. At that moment, most professionals know what is happening. Imagine if Bob Diamond had asked Paul Tucker to put in writing what he was saying on the telephone. I think Mr. Tucker would have understood the consequences.
Fourth, if staff record, then you have to retain the recording appropriately. I think that many organisations struggle with paper compliance. Do you want to have the burden of electronic recordings?
Fifth, the spoken word does not allow for speed listening. For every minute of recording has a minute of listening. You cannot speed listen in the way that you can speed read.
Finally, staff will not behave differently knowing they are recorded. The LIBOR traders knew (and know) all calls are recorded. The LIBOR traders did not behave differently even though they knew they were being recorded.
Best,
Lawrence
________________________________
Help protect our environment by only printing this email if absolutely necessary. The information it contains and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only intended for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may be unlawful for you to use, share or copy the information, if you are not authorised to do so. If you receive this email by mistake, please inform the person who sent it at the above address and then delete the email from your system. Durham County Council takes reasonable precautions to ensure that its emails are virus free. However, we do not accept responsibility for any losses incurred as a result of viruses we might transmit and recommend that you should use your own virus checking procedures.
Brian Morgan
Freelance Journalist
Cardiff, UK
[log in to unmask]
www.brianmorgan.co.uk
02920 222656
07952 982573
Fax +44 (0)871 247 7030
NUJ Member 080549
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|