a laundry list of how you'd make a very different work is far from a
critique on the actual artwork.
On 20 July 2012 21:30, Simon Biggs <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I think my critique was clear as to why the work seems less than interesting. It visualises something but employs 'codes' that do little to unpack or problematise the subject.
>
>
> Sent from a mobile device, thus the brevity.
>
> Simon Biggs
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.littlepig.org.uk
>
> On 20 Jul 2012, at 20:08, Mj C <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Estela, Aaron Koblin flight paths was just shown in London: http://greyisgood.eu/blog/624
>
> Simon, how is the work not about impact on the environment? Just because it's not explicit doesn't mean I don't consider or imagine... I prefer to consider an artwork as presented by the artist, not how I'd like it to be. It is about commercial flight patterns in the USA.
>
>
|