Yes, that's possible. Easiest without changing the code is to perform an f-test within a glm, using the eigenvariate as predictor.
Hth
Christian
Sent from my iPad
On 18.06.2012, at 12:35, bettyann <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Ha ha, yes, I had forgotten.
> :)
>
>
>> be patient. the beautiful people are coming home from china...
>> CZ
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:20:04 +0100
>>> From: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: [FSL] total variance explained by fslmeants --eig ?
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> No takers on my question about total variance explained?
>>> Any suggestions? fslstats? Modify the code in fslmeants?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> * ba
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to calculate the total variance explained by the
>>>> eigenvariate gotten from fslmeants --eig ? I am working with the
>>>> first eigenvariate, ie, the default --order=1.
>>>>
>>>> For example, I am running the following command and get these
>>>> results:
>>>> fslmeants -i stack4D -m aprioriROI --eig -v
>>>>
>>>> Number of voxels used = 568
>>>> 0.770955
>>>> 0.300617
>>>> 2.625193
>>>> 1.171498
>>>> -0.764930
>>>> -1.787860
>>>> 0.171287
>>>> -1.787860
>>>> -1.347851
>>>> -0.126896
>>>> 0.599735
>>>> -0.356262
>>>> 0.530983
>>>> 0.164187
>>>> 0.115414
>>>> -0.284083
>>>> -0.447750
>>>> 0.322118
>>>> 0.131504
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> - bettyAnn
|