JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  May 2012

CCP4BB May 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies per asymmetric unit

From:

Gabor Bunkoczi <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Gabor Bunkoczi <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 1 May 2012 13:49:16 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (91 lines)

This seems to be very a common scenario in MR and recently we have added 
some code to phaser.MRage that would handle it automatically. Each partial 
solution is analysed for the presence of (complete of incomplete) 
assemblies that obey local point group symmetry. After such an assembly is 
identified, the program can either "fill in" molecules where they should be 
(provided the obey the previously identified local symmetry), and can also 
search with the full assembly. This greatly enhances the signal (since the 
model comprises a larger fraction of the asymmetric unit), and also speeds 
up the search.

(MRage is not yet included in the current CCP4 release, but available as 
alpha-test in recent Phenix nightly builds.)

BW, Gabor

On Apr 30 2012, Roger Rowlett wrote:

>A partial solution can potentially lead you to an appropriate MR 
>solution. With many protein chains in the ASU,  there will be several 
>"reasonable" possibilities by Matthews analysis. When I originally 
>solved 2A8D, cell content analysis suggested 8 monomers per ASU, but it 
>was clear after a few MR runs that was not going to work. Inspecting the 
>packing of a partial solution with 4 monomers, which formed a nice, 
>biological-looking tetramer, clearly suggested that another dimer would 
>fit into the lattice just nicely. A search with 3 such dimers produced 
>an excellent MR solution starting point for the final refinement. I used 
>a similar procedure for 3UAO. The Matthews analysis suggested 10-12 
>chains per ASU, but it was clearly 8 based on packing of partial 
>solutions. A 4-dimer search was immediately successful.
>
>Cheers,
>
>_______________________________________
>Roger S. Rowlett
>Gordon & Dorothy Kline Professor
>Department of Chemistry
>Colgate University
>13 Oak Drive
>Hamilton, NY 13346
>
>tel: (315)-228-7245
>ofc: (315)-228-7395
>fax: (315)-228-7935
>email: [log in to unmask]
>
>On 4/30/2012 5:20 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>> Provided that you guess the number of copies and your guess is 
>> reasonably close, my experience is that Phaser will do the job. But 
>> you have to tell it how many copies you expect, or it will never make 
>> sense of the data. When I did my structure with 6(?) copies some years 
>> ago, I guessed a number that was close enough and then when I 
>> inspected the electron density I could see that there were more copies 
>> than I had told the software and all was fine after that. It was 
>> surprising to see that good solutions were obvious from a packing 
>> consideration, while inadequate solutions were obviously wrong.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ke, Jiyuan <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: CCP4BB <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Mon, Apr 30, 2012 2:28 pm
>> Subject: [ccp4bb] Suggestions for solving a structure with 8-10 copies 
>> per asymmetric unit
>>
>> Dear All, I have a question regarding solving a crystal structure by 
>> molecular replacement. It is a single protein with a molecular weight of 
>> 25.5 kDa. The cell dimension is rather big from the diffraction data ( 
>> 90.9 Å, 143.9 Å, 216.3Å, 90°, 90°, 90°). The possible space group is 
>> P212121. With such a big unit cell, we predicted that there are 8-10 
>> molecules per asymmetric unit. We have a decent model with sequence 
>> similarity of 49%. I tried several times with Phaser search with the 
>> current model and had difficulty to find any clear solution. Has anyone 
>> seen such cases and any suggestions to solve the structure? Thanks! 
>> Jiyuan Ke, Ph.D. Research Scientist Van Andel Research Institute 333 
>> Bostwick Ave NE Grand Rapids, MI 49503
>

-- 
##################################################

     Dr Gabor Bunkoczi

     Cambridge Institute for Medical Research
     Wellcome Trust/MRC Building
     Addenbrooke's Hospital
     Hills Road
     Cambridge CB2 0XY
##################################################

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager