On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mark Taylor <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012, Tim Jenness wrote:
>> yes. Although in general we can't expect people on stardev to know who to call.
> Four times out of five it's me who reports this particular issue -
> I'll try to contact Henry direct in future (maybe CCing this list
> for info).
The starlink server is up again.
>> Switching to distributed revision control does have some advantages
>> when you have an unreliable server.
> Yes I appreciate that. However that machine is also the www.starlink.ac.uk
> HTTP server which is the canonical target for application-specific pages
> (it's used by me and users for http://www.starlink.ac.uk/topcat etc),
> so going github wouldn't solve all my Hawaiian reliability issues.
Yes. That is a problem.