JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  May 2012

POETRYETC May 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: verdictive

From:

Dominic Fox <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc: poetry and poetics

Date:

Wed, 30 May 2012 12:30:23 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (45 lines)

There's a marvellously catty footnote to one of Hill's essays where he
refers to Larkin as having been afforded in later life almost
unlimited credit at the bank of Opinion (or words to that effect). I
do wonder whether some similar glamour isn't in effect with the late
Hill: since he's known to be "difficult", to be a champion of
difficulty even, every line he sets down is taken to vibrate with
manifold theologico-etymological co-implications. Even the duff lines,
only some of which are deliberately duff.

In a way, I like that he'll write a duff line, squint at it, make a
feeble joke about its duffness and move briskly on - inasmuch as
that's part of the performance - but there is a point beyond which the
meta-clowning of a Frankie Howerd - oh, please yourselves! - ceases to
make up for the direness of the actual material.

There's lots in Odi Barbare that I really like, and the overall sway
of the poem is (for me) pretty compelling, but that's more down to the
rhythm than anything else. Three times I went into the Waterstones
near work and nearly bought Clavics, and three times I found myself
looking over the contents, going "nah..." and walking out
empty-handed. In the end, I picked up a copy at Hill's reading at the
Southbank Centre, and stood in line for him to sign it. It's not all
bad. But, my God, some of it really *is* bad.

An editor competent to sift through Hill and separate the
worth-keeping from the not-worth-keeping would be hard to find,
though. His late verse seems designed to run athwart of the
conventional literary competencies with which one might approach it.
Some of that is - mischievously confessed - misdirection, the
manipulation of prestige. I used to play chess against a boy who made
all kinds of bad moves, real howlers, in a way that befuddled normal
tactical thinking (I remember hearing that an element of Bobby
Fischer's genius was his willingness to surrender advantages that a
nonplussed opponent would be too intimidated to exploit); at the same
time, he often seemed to manage to manoeuvre his knights into
positions where they could skewer you in unpleasant ways if you
weren't careful. Late Hill seems to me to be playing in a similar
style: you're never quite sure when he's being a patzer. All of which
reminds me of the epigraph to one of Prynne's more frustratingly
opaque collections: "Anyone who takes up this book will, we expect,
have done so because at the back of his mind he has a half-formed
belief that there is something in it."

Dominic

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager