-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nat,
isn't this partially discussed by Morris' and Bricogne's article about
"Sheldrick's 1.2A rule and beyond" (Acta Cryst D59, 2003)?
Tim
On 05/09/12 20:44, Nat Echols wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Edward A. Berry
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Still I would expect to see peaks in a wilson plot around
>> bond-length resolution, similar to the peaks due to secondary
>> structure at lower resolution.
>
> I was curious about this myself, so I looked at the Wilson plot for
> an atomic-resolution structure (attached). There is at best a
> small hump around 1.5A; I suspect uncertainties in atomic positions
> (i.e. the B-factor) reduce the effect. This was consistent in
> several other atom-resolution datasets (of different proteins).
> I'm curious what the bump around 2.25A is.
>
> -Nat
- --
- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen
GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFPqr14UxlJ7aRr7hoRAoEkAJ4+XvGEVGW8hQxBKmHvcd4cLiARoACcDH+4
bAfYYAPMdjvJpO8Q1lEV+Tg=
=cy7M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|