if you want the xml node to node contents mapping, that is 106 MB
if you want to be able to tie nodes to individual items, then that adds 60 MB
That is in indexed MySQL tables (and I have 3-4 more sites to index yet)
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Lorna Campbell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 3 Apr 2012, at 19:28, Pat Lockley wrote:
>
> I have a sort of set of OER Metadata, is fifteen grand the fee still?
>
> It was 10K, but the funds have now been reallocated :/
>
> Cheers
> Lorna
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Phil Barker <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> On 03/04/12 17:03, Pat Lockley wrote:
>
> Xpert logs every search, and attribution, and social media share.
>
> Guessing edshare and jorum must have logs?
>
>
> OK, there are two things here. First some analysis of "in-system" search log
> files to see what terms people search for because this might yield useful
> information about what metadata we should provide. We didn't get any bids to
> do this when we suggested it as a miniproject. It's still in my workplan to
> explore this more, but if anyone wants to pick it up...
>
> Secondly referrer log or Google analytic data to show how people get to OER
> hosting sites, or resources on those sites (do they come via Google
> searches, do they get straight to the OER page or have to go via the
> home/search page or some other page). That kind of overlaps a bit with the
> first thing if you extend it to include analysis of what search terms are
> used when Google is the route to the site, but it is different.
>
> Some of the resources from when we first had these discussions (at the
> #CetisWMD meeting) are gathered at
> http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Event:_what_metadata_is_really_useful and
> http://blogs.cetis.ac.uk/philb/2010/10/19/cetiswmd-summary/
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Lorna Campbell<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Hi Jenny,
>
> a) do learners value the finer little OERs
>
> Not sure about learners, but I think educators do. There's a reasonable
> amount of feedback from users of OU materials that a finer-grained download
> than 'the whole unit' would be appreciated.
>
> b) is google THE 'aggregator' or 'finder'
>
> Probably, and definitely for people who aren't already familiar with the
> OER movement - that's to say the ordinary teacher who just wants an x to use
> in next week's lesson. Wasn't there some discussion / work a while back
> about mining our sites' statistics to find out that sort of thing? Certainly
> over half of OpenLearn traffic comes from search.
>
> Yes, mining search logs to find out more about how users search for
> educational resources was one of the things we wanted to explore through the
> OER Mini Projects. Nobody submitted a bid though :( We still think there's
> really useful work to be done there though. Perhaps we need o explore
> other ways to get this done. Anyone got any suggestions?
>
> Cheers
> Lorna
>
> --
> Lorna M. Campbell
> JISC CETIS Assistant Director
> University of Strathclyde
> Glasgow
> Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Phone: +44141 548 3072
> Skype: lorna120768
>
> The University of Strathclyde is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, number SC015263.
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu: not so much an operating system as a learning opportunity.
>
> --
> Lorna M. Campbell
> JISC CETIS Assistant Director
> University of Strathclyde
> Glasgow
> Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Phone: +44141 548 3072
> Skype: lorna120768
>
> The University of Strathclyde is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, number SC015263.
|
