> 1. the kind of textual variance that we classical philologists are actually interested in is exactly that provided by a print apparatus criticus (only sense-changing variants, 'normalised' spelling etc.; by the way: might this have to do with the fact that we all have trained ourselves upon print apparati critici and this is the modelling of textual variance we are accustomed to?);
>
punctuation is also important and rarely attested in print editions.
The United Bible Societies Greek New Testament is a model here. Esp
for punctuation where there are no "errors" but only variant
interpretations to have an on-screen toggle to show the same passage
in two or three different ways.
jo'd
|