Dear Marc,
I would release the PDB coordinates at the RCSB. The release will protect
you from
use of the coordinates since you have now acquired a release date prior to
referee viewing.
Assuming that an honest referee would request the coordinates only to
verify that all is well
before final approval of the manuscript, you would anticipate release by
only a few weeks.
On the other hand, is you are not sure that all is well, the referee is
likely to help
you correct any errors in the structure before it is released for
everybody to notice
that you could have done better. I agree with Remy that 99.99% of the
referees are honest, and
although not necessarily in agreement with your own vision, are there to
help science
and those that practice it with honesty.
If the paper is refused and the coordinates used for MR your PDB code is
likely to be referred to.
That is essentially a citation.
Enrico.
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:31:12 +0200, Vellieux Frederic
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this practice (requesting the data) is getting more and more
> common these days with some "scientists" having published fake
> structures. You are far more protected from scientific misconduct when
> you provide the data to referees (this takes place through an editorial
> system - you should keep a copy of all correspondence and requests) than
> you are in your own lab where your next door neighbor may decide to use
> your results for his/her own benefit without giving you any credit.
>
> Should your paper be rejected and if you see your structure published by
> others soon afterwards, you could argue with an editor that your data
> may have been used by others provided that you have kept a copy of
> everything as mentioned before in this mail.
>
> Fred.
>
> Marc Kvansakul wrote:
>> Dear CCP4BBlers, I was wondering how common it is that reviewers
>> request to have a copy of the PDB coordinate file for the review
>> purpose. I have just been asked to supply this by an editor after
>> several weeks of review, after one of the reviewers requested a copy.
>> Not having ever been asked to do this before I feel just a tad
>> uncomfortable about handing this over…
>>
>> Your opinions would be greatly appreciated. Best wishes
>>
>> Marc
>>
>> Dr. Marc Kvansakul
>> Laboratory Head, NHMRC CDA Fellow
>> Dept. of Biochemistry| La Trobe University | Bundoora
>> Rm 218, Phys Sci Bld 4, Kingsbury Drive, Melbourne, 3086, Australia
>> T: 03 9479 2263 | F: 03 9479 2467 | E: [log in to unmask] |
>>
--
Enrico A. Stura D.Phil. (Oxon) , Tel: 33 (0)1 69 08 4302 Office
Room 19, Bat.152, Tel: 33 (0)1 69 08 9449 Lab
LTMB, SIMOPRO, IBiTec-S, CE Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, FRANCE
http://www-dsv.cea.fr/en/institutes/institute-of-biology-and-technology-saclay-ibitec-s/unites-de-recherche/department-of-molecular-engineering-of-proteins-simopro/molecular-toxinology-and-biotechnology-laboratory-ltmb/crystallogenesis-e.-stura
http://www.chem.gla.ac.uk/protein/mirror/stura/index2.html
e-mail: [log in to unmask] Fax: 33 (0)1 69 08 90 71
|