JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS  April 2012

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS April 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: beef

From:

Tim Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

British & Irish poets <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:37:28 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (87 lines)

Hi Michael, now I'm not Peter Riley, and Peter Riley and myself have  
had our differences in the past with regards to the hard and soft  
options of opposition etc, but I do think you are being unfair here. I  
was tempted to follow up Peter's post with my own views about  
Burnside's poetry, but essentially what Peter said about it, as a  
description, matched my own take on it perfectly. The difference I  
suppose is the emotional one. How do we try to be objective about  
something that in certain terms appears to be quite excellent and yet  
does next to nothing for us personally (subjectively I suppose), or  
worse, highly irritates us? The choices are not simple. The work in  
question finds us enthusiastic or neutral or negative or irritated etc  
for a reason. Yes, what Peter doesn't do is shine any light on those  
reasons, the reasons for his own implied lack of enthusiasm for the  
work, but the alternative, to delve into the mechanics of that  
situation, is a sticky one, because it nearly always ends up in the  
attempt to fight    the battle from the 'poetics' corner, which leads  
to ideology and entrenchment. I'm not saying it has to do that, but  
that it usually does. And Peter is someone who does not do that, and  
for those very same reasons, I would assume. Therefore his critique is  
implied, not stated - it maintains a rather safe position, but it is a  
safe position which leaves the issue open to civilized debate. The  
problem with this, from my own experience, is that it limits the  
debate, it papers over what are fundamental fractures.

But the alternative, which is my own polemical experience, is fraught  
with problems - you start digging a hole and the hole gets deeper. I  
would never say that I had an entrenched position, but I would say  
that I was often pushed into what looked and behaved like one. What  
critique from an entrenched position tends to do is to take almost  
everything that is considered to be positive about a poem and turn it  
into a negative - which might seem to be ridiculous, after all this is  
poetry we're talking about, a shared activity to some degree, surely -  
we call both Carol Ann Duffy and Allen Fisher poets. And yet this  
attempt to understand what is going on with our positive and negative  
responses needs to be articulated. The question now is how to do it  
without the emotional while at the same time not restricting its  
scope. Not easy - because I am pretty sure that straight description  
(such as Riley's of Burnside) will probably be received negatively by  
those who 'love' Burnside's poetry. They don't want its mystery  
deconstructed.

Cheers

Tim A.

On 25 Apr 2012, at 12:10, [log in to unmask] wrote:

> I don't know if anyone else thinks this but I've been mainly  
> disappointed with Peter's pieces in the Fortnightly Review, except  
> for the one about Denise Riley. I think maybe this idea of avant- 
> garde poet addresses the civilized non-specialist is full of fatal  
> contradictions.
>
> I want him to say "I loathe John Burnside and everyone who likes  
> him", if that's what he thinks. Not do the faint praise and smearing  
> thing, which just feels dishonest. Like it's apparent to me that  
> there really is NOTHING that peter likes about JB's poetry, and he  
> can't be bothered to challenge his own opinion or to understand why  
> JB keeps winning.
>
> And I don't get the cattle analogy. Surely the point about existing  
> poetry competitions is that they ARE objective, precisely a matter  
> of sheaths and muscle. It isn't difficult to understand what makes a  
> poem a prize-winning poem. And this complex system of hoops to be  
> jumped through is indeed excellence of a sort.  It is not the  
> excellence of Excavations, true.  (I reckon Alstonefield could have  
> gone close. )
>
> This was a missed opportunity. It ought to have been about the way  
> that poetry-collection prizes are always awarded to the same  
> publishers. The point that Ron Silliman has made, much more  
> persuasively, many many times.
>
> I don't really see why there aren't any competitions specifically  
> intended to recognize experimental work, though.  I'd be prepared to  
> swallow quite a lot of ideological distaste in return for a wider  
> debate about the kind of books I care about.
>
> But I think it's good and a huge thing that poetry isn't dependent  
> on prizes and competitions, that's a precious quality.  For  
> logistical reasons arts like classical music are completely  
> integrated with competition and patronage; that's bound to affect  
> the nature of the art, both for good and ill. Poetry is something we  
> can completely reinvent and no-one can stop us or even do much to  
> penalize us. (Because, as Jamie says, these "big prizes" are really  
> pretty paltry.)

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager