On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:28 PM, Ewan MacMahon wrote:
> I basically really like it; it's just plain good. Being really
> picky, I'd note:
> - Sometimes the WN caches seem to go a bit over their
> configured size limit.
Not much I hope, when the cache goes over it reduces occupancy to 50% (?) but not until
the current write of files has been done.
> - It's not the most graceful failure in the case of a
> full cache directory,
Agreed there's a savannah ticket on that one.
> - Ditto in the case of a dead squid.
Use another squid at a second site to avoid the problem.
What actually happens? It goes into offline mode I guess
but you don't really know?
> All the time we haven't done something to break it though,
> it's been very solid.