fwiw, RDA has a role for Production company, but does not put it in its
list of "creators"; it's in "other", which is equivalent to
MARC relators do not include Production company, and the role seems to be
associated with individual persons (Producer), not corporate bodies.
[I tried to create a github account to add this comment, but there was an
On 09 March 2012 at 16:40 Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I looked at github and didn't see where to make comments, so i'll do so
> here and maybe someone can add it to github for me...
> re: schema:productionCompany rdfs:subPropertyOf dct:creator
> I would contact a film expert to determine if production companies are
> seen as publishers/funders or as creators.
> On 3/9/12 7:15 AM, Thomas Baker wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > The process of finalizing a set of mappings from DCMI Metadata Terms to
> > Schema.org has been stalled. I have been the bottleneck for this,
> > strongly feel we should have a well-functioning issue tracking and
> > workflow in place before taking final decisions on the mappings
> > decided in January to use the issue tracker of Git, but I haven't found
> > time to get my head around how this would work in practice.
> > Specifically, we need a way to collect issues about individual mappings
> > structured way without trying to do this on the dc-architecture list.
> > we decide on the mappings, we need a way to collect comments from the
> > in a structured way so that we can mark mappings for reconsideration in
> > of better understanding.
> > Thanks to Jon, I have set up a Github account for DCMI , which Kai
> > have graciously volunteered to help maintain. Thanks to Jon again, the
> > mappings have been published in Git as well as on the wiki .
> > Corey has offered to lead the way on using Git for issue tracking by
> > some into  and explaining how our use of the tracker will work. I
> > issues of detail with the mappings, but here is one to get us started:
> > Proposed:
> > schema:about owl:equivalentProperty dct:subject
> > Tom says:
> > The relation should be subPropertyOf because the domain of
schema:about is more restricted.
> > I have posted a Doodle poll at  to find a time in early April for a
> > by which time we hopefully will have been able to sort out the
> > of issue tracking and publication on this list...
> > Tom
> >  https://github.com/dcmi
> > 
> >  http://www.doodle.com/6qwfqtvcg6nk2ghr
> Karen Coyle
> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet