Stephen Gowdy mentioned this in his GDB report last week. It is the bit upstream of the stratum-0 that produces software releases that is being changed.
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Andrew Lahiff
> Sent: 27 March 2012 16:12
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: gridpp cvmfs slide
>
> Hi,
>
> The RAL Tier-1 will start using CVMFS for CMS soon, once the hardware
> CMS uses for CVMFS deployments is upgraded to be of production quality
> (I think this might be happening next week).
>
> Regards,
> Andrew.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alessandra Forti
> Sent: 27 March 2012 16:02
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: gridpp cvmfs slide
>
> All Atlas and LHCb.
>
> CMS is not yet converted to cvmfs afaik but this might have changed in
> the last month.
>
>
> On 27/03/2012 15:56, Christopher J. Walker wrote:
> > On 27/03/12 16:30, Alessandra Forti wrote:
> >> Hi Sam,
> >>
> >> Lhcb said last July they wanted cvmfs and that's why in the atlas
> cvmfs
> >> page I put also lhcb instructions. They didn't push loudly in the UK
> >> because we were already moving.
> >>
> >
> > What's the current status of ATLAS, LHCb and CMS.
> >
> > AIUI, all the ATLAS sites have converted - and probably all the UK
> > sites that support ATLAS.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >> cheers
> >> alessandra
> >>
> >> On 27/03/2012 15:23, Sam Skipsey wrote:
> >>> Hi Chris,
> >>>
> >>> I think I gave my small points earlier in that thread.
> >>>
> >>> Basically, though, fairly straightforward; after the initial slow
> >>> start identifying the initial corruption issue, support has been
> >>> responsive, rapid and effective.
> >>>
> >>> Also, it helped with LHCb (despite their not actually telling
> people
> >>> to use it until just now) as much as ATLAS.
> >>>
> >>> Sam
> >>>
> >>> On 27 March 2012 15:21, Christopher J. Walker
> <[log in to unmask]
> >>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I've volunteered to give a brief talk on CVMFS experience in
> the
> >>> UK.
> >>>
> >>> I'm in the process of updating the talk I gave at hepsysman in
> >>> BHAM.
> >>>
> >>> Steve Traylan wants info on:
> >>>
> >>> On 26/03/12 17:18, Steve Traylen wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >> > I guess the practical application/problems / scale/
> >>> difficulty ,
> >>>
> >>> easyness to deploy.
> >>>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Problems you anticipate,
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > I guess the message from the whole session is
> >>> proposing that cvmfs is
> >>>
> >>> good for other
> >>>
> >>> >> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So if anyone has anything useful to add, I need it ASAP - the
> talk
> >>> is tomorrow morning.
> >>>
> >>> Chris
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
|