I thought it seemed just intrusive enough - enough to make you click on
it (it was almost the first thing I noticed on the page) but if you
decide not to accept cookies and therefore it has to stay there, it's
not too tiresome.
Does the law define how much the question should obtrude every time? :-)
K
On 03/14/12 11:49, Tim Trent wrote:
> I see an issue, regrettably, with "unobtrusive" in that this stupid law means we are meant to intrude into people's browsing. Grrrrrrrrrrrr
>
> On 14 Mar 2012, at 11:15, Kate Byrne wrote:
>
>> I rather like the way the John Gray Centre ( http://www.johngraycentre.org/) have done it - an unobtrusive but inviting little icon that takes you to a simple yet comprehensive explanation (with optional biscuit recipes thrown in) and goes away once you accept.
>>
>> Kate
>>
>>
--
Kate Byrne
School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/kbyrne3/
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
****************************************************************
website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
[un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************
|