JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for TB-SUPPORT Archives


TB-SUPPORT Archives

TB-SUPPORT Archives


TB-SUPPORT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TB-SUPPORT Home

TB-SUPPORT Home

TB-SUPPORT  February 2012

TB-SUPPORT February 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Ticket summary - 20th Feb 12

From:

Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:14:36 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (74 lines)

The only people who can feign surprise are those who don't listen or who 
forget.

We never had more than one pool because as Kashif points out the writing 
is random anyway. I'm not even sure if the solution proposed is real or 
if it works because Glasgow has 4 times smaller fs and a larger common 
area. Infact adding a new pool and adding a file system adds the whole 
60TB to the new pool which means removing it from the atlas pool. We can 
reinstall one of the old DELL (~480GB) as a DPM fs but I'm not going to 
sacrifice more than that to this.

POOL atlas_pool DEFSIZE 20.00T GC_START_THRESH 0 GC_STOP_THRESH 0 
DEF_LIFETIME 7.0d DEFPINTIME 2.0h MAX_LIFETIME 1.0m MAXPINTIME 12.0h 
FSS_POLICY maxfreespace GC_POLICY lru RS_POLICY fifo GIDS 0 S_TYPE P 
MIG_POLICY none RET_POLICY R
                               CAPACITY 604.95T FREE 0 (  0.0%)
[.....]
   se12.tier2.hep.manchester.ac.uk /raid CAPACITY 54.49T FREE 16.38T ( 
30.1%)
[.....]
POOL ops_pool DEFSIZE 50.00G GC_START_THRESH 0 GC_STOP_THRESH 0 
DEF_LIFETIME 7.0d DEFPINTIME 2.0h MAX_LIFETIME 1.0m MAXPINTIME 12.0h 
FSS_POLICY maxfreespace GC_POLICY lru RS_POLICY fifo GIDS 104 S_TYPE - 
MIG_POLICY none RET_POLICY R
                               CAPACITY 54.49T FREE 16.38T ( 30.1%)
   se12.tier2.hep.manchester.ac.uk /raid/ops CAPACITY 54.49T FREE 16.38T 
( 30.1%)

BTW sites were still accused of "cheating" at the ops TEG for using 
reservations to make ops test pass when clusters are full.

cheers
alessandra

On 21/02/2012 12:08, Daniela Bauer wrote:
> But the ops tests have been around for *ages* and the consequences
> known, so I don't think it'll suit us well to feign surprise right
> now. Just give ops 500 GB and be done with it.
>
> Daniela
>
> On 21 February 2012 12:05, Sam Skipsey<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>>
>> On 21 February 2012 11:45, Stephen Burke<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>>> Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
>>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Gordon said:
>>>> If this has been a long-standing DPM issue then I will ask to have this
>>>> test (SRMput ?) removed from the SRMV2 set of tests so that it isn't
>>>> included in availability.
>>> Even if there really was no free space for ops, does that make the SE
>>> unavailable? Any VO may fill up its space, that doesn't mean the site is
>>> broken. Probably the intention is that the test is just supposed to verify
>>> the functionality and no-one has considered the possibility of it being
>>> full. (CE tests are similar if the queues are full - there I think most
>>> sites do have an explicit reservation just to let the ops tests run.)
>>>
>> This is a valid point, and what I was getting at with my nagios test
>> comment: the test doesn't test if the storage is available, it tests if ops
>> can write to the storage. (Now, obviously, there's a point at which you have
>> to consider that a test has to test *something*...). ATLAS, meanwhile, can
>> happily write to the storage; and even ops tests are happy talking to the
>> storage, and it is responding in a reasonable and sane way.
>>
>> I note that Manchester is an almost entirely ATLAS site. It seems reasonable
>> that their availability be determined by their being available for the
>> entities that they are supposed to be supporting in the main, surely?
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>> Stephen
>>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager