I should take a look at the problem. In general 2D layout is generated from 3D locations that are stored in the dataset. So there shouldn't be reliance on any specific assumptions about the system. But that's only in theory.
On 28 Feb 2012, at 17:45, Martin Dietz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Vladimir & MEG users,
> SPM doesn't automatically recognize the 2D sensor layout of Neuromag Triux data during conversion. This is probably due to the fact that the relation between channel number and name has changed between the Vectorview and the Triux. Could you point me to where in the conversion routines the reading of the layout for *.fif files takes place ? Or should this be changed using spm_eeg_prep ?
> Best wishes