JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPM Archives


SPM Archives

SPM Archives


SPM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPM Home

SPM Home

SPM  February 2012

SPM February 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Normalization errors and Artifacts. Are they related?

From:

"Neggers, S.F.W." <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Neggers, S.F.W.

Date:

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:10:03 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (83 lines)

PS: the dropout you see in orbitofrontal cortex seems the normal dropout for EPI in that region, caused by the air filled cavities around the sinusses leading to field inhomogeneities around there. Not much you can do, except make it smaller by narrower slices and shorter TE, and perhaps playing around with angulation. It will never go away completely. With Echo-Shifted 3D EPI sequences you can reduce TE even further and the dropout will be pretty small, but still there. You should see this for most EPIs you guys are running? There are many papers on this problem and possible remedies. Or perhaps I am wrong and this dropout at the lower brain is somewhere else, I couldn't tell with certainty from your attachments.

The dropout in the top of the cortex is something unusual and something to check. I'd second Donald that there could be some metal left in or on the skin of the subject around that area. Perhaps metal shrapnel from someone who has worked with metal, or something left there from an injury? We usually X-ray subjects when we suspect something like that, and it should be an exclusion criterion in your screening procedure as it poses a certain risk to the subjects when they have possibly ferromagnetic metal in or around their body. I don't want to lecture anyone but this can be a serious risk.

Or perhaps there is an issue with your SENSE coil (yes I scanned on your 3T Achieva once, about 3yrs ago ;-) ).

Good luck, and say hi to Sharika,

Bas

________________________________
From: SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping) [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of MCLAREN, Donald [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SPM] Normalization errors and Artifacts. Are they related?


On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Vaibhav Tyagi <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Dear SPMers,

I am acquiring EPI data to standardize fMRI paradigm for one of my
studies. Unfortunately, the acquired EPI images are having artifacts in
the form of a chunk of missing data (images 1 & 2 attached for reference
are raw EPI images). Can someone confirm whether I can use any specific
analysis to correctly analyze this data. In order to see how SPM handles
such data, I have already performed pre-processing and GLM analysis. The
activation map is shifted down with respect to standard MNI glass brain
window (image 3 attached for reference, at p < 1 uncorrected).

I have several questions regarding this problem -

1. What may be the possible cause of this kind of artifact in the images?

Metal on the head or in the scanner.


What can be the remedy?

Make sure there is nothing that could cause signal dropout.

You should see similar missing areas on your other scans from this same subject.


2. Are such image artifacts causing the normalization errors? If yes, then
I would expect 'SPM normalize' function to stretch EPI images up (to fill
the missing space). Why are the normalized images shifted down?

SPM normalizes the whole brain. As such if I take a chunk out, then it might align everything else, but not be able to normalize that portion. You have to remember, normalization can't create data that didn't exist. If can't pull data from one part of the brain into the part that is missing.

I'd look at the T1 and see if the artifact is there. Also, if you have the localizer or scout image still, it should be apparent in that image. If you have dropout that is potentially due to metal, I'd remove the subject and find the metal or figure out what is causing the artifact before continuing the scan.



Thanks in anticipation.

-Vaibhav Tyagi
Speech and language laboratory
National brain research centre
Gurgaon, India


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is
uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht
ontvangt, wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct
te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. Het Universitair Medisch
Centrum Utrecht is een publiekrechtelijke rechtspersoon in de zin van de W.H.W.
(Wet Hoger Onderwijs en Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek) en staat geregistreerd bij
de Kamer van Koophandel voor Midden-Nederland onder nr. 30244197.

Denk s.v.p aan het milieu voor u deze e-mail afdrukt.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message may contain confidential information and is intended exclusively
for the addressee. If you receive this message unintentionally, please do not
use the contents but notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. University
Medical Center Utrecht is a legal person by public law and is registered at
the Chamber of Commerce for Midden-Nederland under no. 30244197.

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager