The source reconstruction code in SPM has changed since the manual
figures were generated due to ongoing optimization of various
low-level routines. So it's not surprising that the results you got
are slightly different from those in the manual. I wouldn't be worried
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Ozge Batu <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear SPM users,
> I repeated EEG analysis steps for multimodal face-evoked responses data as explained in the SPM manual (section 37.4). I obtained consistent results and figures in all of the steps except the source reconstruction part. The outcome figures of my inverse solution are attached. Neither the time course of the peak voxel nor the source distribution at 180 ms are similar to ones given in the manual. According to your knowledge and experience, is there any additional steps that are applied but not mentioned in the manual?