JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


FSL@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

FSL  January 2012

FSL January 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Specifying POSSUM Activation 4d timecourses using simulated time series

From:

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:36:20 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (108 lines)

Dear Michael,

You've pretty much got it.
The list of points 1-5 are all correct except for:
 - units are in seconds, not milliseconds
 - T2* changes are all relative to the baseline, static value
and not the prior volume (as 1 seems to imply, but
conflicts with what you say in 2, which is correct)

So you need to scale the values in your 4D file to represent
changes in T2* in units of seconds (e.g. 0.001 would represent
1 millisecond).

S0 is an intensity value not a T2* value, so it is in arbitrary units
and not in seconds or milliseconds. The S = S0*exp(-TE/T2*)
equation is about _intensity_ values. So if you had a TE of 30ms
and a T2* of 51ms then S=S0*exp(-30/51) = 0.55531*S0
whereas if T2* increased by 5.1ms (an increase is what you'd
expect with more activation, as there's less deoxyHb and less
field distortion, so longer T2*) then you'd have an intensity of
S=S0*(-30/56.5) = 0.58803*S0. This would represent a
signal increase of 0.58803/0.55531 = 1.0589 (or about 6%).
Note that this signal increase is more simply calculated as
exp(-TE/T2*B +TE/T2*1) where T2*A and T2*B are the two relevant
T2* values (so exp(-30/56.5 +30/51)=1.0589).

Therefore, to achieve a certain value of percent signal change
(which is normally what people think about) then you need to
solve the equation: exp(-TE/T2*B + TE/T2*A)=desired factor
setting T2*A=51ms and TE and desired factor as appropriate.
For example, a 10% signal change, with a 30ms TE, means:
  exp(-30/T2* + 30/51)=1.1 => -30/T2* + 30/51=ln(1.1)
 => T2* = 30/(30/51-ln(1.1)) = 60.8 and so the change in T2*
that would need to be encoded in the 4D activation file would
be 60.8 - 51 = 9.8ms = 0.0098 seconds.

I hope this helps explain how this part works.

You do need to specify the --activt4D input.

You can limit the voxels that POSSUM calculates by changing
the input brain object. It will only calculate things for object
voxels present in this image. So feel free to take the default
brain and mask out whatever you like. This will certainly speed
things up, although it won't give you the right solutions in the
case of motions, as you need the other voxels present, but I
don't know if that is of interest to you or not.

All the best,
Mark




On 24 Jan 2012, at 19:37, Michael Hallquist wrote:

> Dear FSL gurus (especially Mark and Ivana):
>
> I have a question about how to setup a 4d activation timecourse file
> using simulated time series not generated from empirical fMRI data. I
> realize that there have been a number of questions on the listserv
> about how to specify these files and I've read through these posts in
> detail. Yet I'm getting stuck on how to properly scale time series
> that are in arbitrary units and where there is no task baseline per se
> (resting state data).
>
> Here's the summary of what I've understood (and please let me know if
> I've misunderstood!):
> 1) The 4d activation file provides voxelwise timecourse specifications
> of T2* changes (i.e., units are T2star dt [delta time], relative to
> prior volume).
> 2) The time course units are milliseconds (representing relaxation
> time) and are relative to the baseline T2* relaxation value specified
> in the MR parameters file. In the case of the stock MRpar_3T file, the
> T2* relaxation time for gray matter is 51ms.
> 3) A value of 0 at any point along a voxel timecourse in the 4d
> activation file means that the intensity will be based on the static
> T2* value alone (51ms per above).
> 4) T2* values are related to simulated signal intensity by the
> following equation: S = S0 * exp(-TE/T2*), where S0 is the baseline
> intensity, TE is the echo time, and T2* is the absolute T2* value.
> 5) To generate signal intensity at a given voxel and timepoint, POSSUM
> sums the T2* value of the static tissue type (51ms above) plus the
> voxelwise, time-specific value in the 4d activation file (e.g., 5.1).
>
> Now to my questions. I have simulated correlated time series in
> arbitrary units that are scaled roughly [-2, 2]. How do I scale these
> time series into the appropriate T2* units for the --activ4D input
> given the equation above? In my case, is S0 51ms or do I need some
> baseline intensity in arbitrary scanner units?
>
> Also, If the static T2* time for gray matter is 51ms and I provide a
> value of 5.1 at the given point in the timecourse, does that
> correspond to a 10% signal change?
>
> Do I always need to specify --activt4D to provide the times for the 4d
> activation file, or will these be computed based on the TR encoded in
> the NIfTI of the activation file?
>
> Lastly and most peripherally, I realize that the 4d activation results
> in computationally and RAM-intensive simulations, which is fine. Is
> there a way to reduce the RAM or computation burden using a mask file
> (simulation within a sparse matrix of sorts)?
>
> Thanks very much for your help,
> Michael
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager