+1 for Github, but +1 for possibility of JIRA if under Atlassian's
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Corey A Harper <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I agree that Github seems like a great choice, particularly if DCMI is
> already planning to use it for managing schema.org alignments &
> perhaps other similar documentation.
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Jon Phipps <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> I'd like to reiterate my github suggestion and also suggest maintaining
>> related documents there. Github is free, the issues tracking interface is
>> simple, effective, and nicely tied to documents hosted at github. Github
>> itself is an excellent centralized document repository for distributed
>> version control.
>> I check email just a couple of times daily; to reach me sooner, click here:
>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:39:08PM +0100, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>>> > That's quite many things, maybe some splitting would help. Btw wasn't
>>> > there talks about an issue tracker?
>>> I agree. This is getting urgent. Can anyone out there help?
>>> There is a nice wiki page about issue tracking at W3C . Tracker is
>>> but it is only available for use by W3C working groups . The classic
>>> Bugzilla is mentioned but characterized as "kind of a double-edged sword
>>> that it provides very powerful tracking and query features for those who
>>> willing to take the time to understand how it works, but it can be a bit
>>> overwhelming and confusing for those who have not had opportunity to work
>>> bug/issue tracking systems before or are not willing to take the time to
>>> the documentation and understand how to use it" .
>>> Also mentioned in  is RoundUp  -- a ten-year-old Python project,
>>> used to
>>> track Python and IETF projects, which I hear is easy to install and easier
>>> use than Bugzilla.
>>> I see in my notes that someone once suggested Assembla  -- a
>>> service to which DCMI would need to subscribe.
>>> If anyone here can testify to the usability (and easy-installability) of
>>> RoundUp, I'd be inclined to go with a system that is included with the
>>> rest of
>>> the DCMI Web archive.
>>> Suggestions, please!
>>>  http://www.w3.org/wiki/TrackingIssues
>>>  http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/
>>>  http://www.bugzilla.org/
>>>  http://roundup.sourceforge.net/
>>>  http://www.assembla.com/
>>> Tom Baker <[log in to unmask]>
> Corey A Harper
> Metadata Services Librarian
> New York University Libraries
> 20 Cooper Square, 3rd Floor
> New York, NY 10003-7112
> [log in to unmask]