On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
[...]
> I suggest we give Github a try, but Trac and Jira sound like good alternatives
> to keep in mind.
>
> In order to set up Github for DCAM issues, I believe we would need to set up a
> DCAM project under http://github.com/dcmi. In this case, the Github issues
> tracker would be used to track issues about documents in the DCMI wiki -- not
> about documents under version control in Github -- but this is doable. Can
> those of you with more experience please confirm that this is a reasonable
> thing to do?
The only obvious thing you lose with this approach is deeper
integration of issue tracker and content (for example, being able to
automatically close an issue ticket with a commit message that
references an issue number).
Bruce
|