Hi
I'd have to say that I *really* like using Phil Evan's new program
"Aimless" rather than Scala - not sure if it's in CCP4 yet but it is
available from his own ftp site for a number of platforms -
ftp://ftp.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/pub/pre
(I think).
In my hands it's faster and more reliable most of the time.
So my route from unmerged files would be pointless then aimless...
On 21 Dec 2011, at 11:29, Vellieux Frederic wrote:
> There are several ways to skin a cat. If you have processed your
> data with XDS, XSCALE can also do the job (you have to think of the
> unit cell parameters of the merged data set though - the default
> may not necessarily what you wish to have), and I am certain other
> data frame processing suites will have this offered as an option
> somewhere... (I personally like all the statistics provided by the
> combat / scala route though).
>
> Fred.
>
> Eleanor Dodson wrote:
>> Do you still have the unmerged files?
>> In that case just feed them to pointless and redo scala/etc..
>>
>> If you only 3 merged data sets, you will have to use combat to
>> convert the mtz files into an fake "unmerged" format then put them
>> through pointless/scala to get relative scales and merge them..
>>
>> Eleanor
>>
>> On 12/21/2011 11:15 AM, arka chakraborty wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have three datasets with same space-group and identical cell
>>> dimensions
>>> which I want to merge together. I remember that this was
>>> discussed in the
>>> blog some time back. Nevertheless, I can use some help!
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> ARKO
>>>
>>
>>
Harry
--
Dr Harry Powell,
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology,
Hills Road,
Cambridge,
CB2 0QH
|