On 27/10/11 15:26, Steven Stapleton wrote:
> For example, a horse uploaded in flickr
> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/nottinghamvets/5927688738/in/set-72157626878331180>
> with unique code ‘C0004P0038’ can then be searched for by that code in
> Xpert
> <http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/xpert/attribution/index.php?searchterm=C0004P0038>
> and by selecting the image with attribution from Xpert you end up with
> this
> <http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/xpert/attribution/pictureattrib/mangle.php?url=http://farm5.static.flickr.com/6004/5927688738_82cd234583_b.jpg&original_url=http://www.flickr.com/63061739@N06/5927688738/&license=flickr_1&flickr_id=5927688738&size=full&picturename=C0004P0038>.
> You can then save the image or embed it into PowerPoint.
Is there any reason why the photo on Flickr shouldn't have the
attribution info on it? I'm not sure if flickr allows you to update
photos, but I've worked on a project which uploaded photos + metadata to
Flickr through their API, and if Xpert attribution tool (or something
based on it) could be put into that workflow then the info could be
added during the upload.
Phil
--
Ubuntu: not so much an operating system as a learning opportunity.
|