JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MINING-HISTORY Archives


MINING-HISTORY Archives

MINING-HISTORY Archives


mining-history@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY  October 2011

MINING-HISTORY October 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FW: Clydach Section of A465 dualling

From:

Peter King <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The mining-history list.

Date:

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:54:38 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (166 lines)

Third Attempt!

 

 

Repeating message after posting rejected for having attachments.  

 

I am forwarding a response that I have had.  I leave it to others to verify
the accuracy (and completeness) of the reports on which they are relying,
something for which archaeological colleagues are much more qualified than I
am.  Having raised the concern, I leave it to others to follow it up.   

 

Peter King

49, Stourbridge Road, 

Hagley

Stourbridge

West Midlands

DY9 0QS

[log in to unmask]

 

From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 24 October 2011 13:44
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: Clydach Section of A465 dualling

 

Good afternoon Dr King, 

 

Thank you for your email and the archaeological information you have
provided. If I can first reassure you that a great deal of consideration has
been given to the archaeological issues associated with the proposed
widening scheme and many survey have been undertaken by Jacobs on behalf of
the Welsh Government since the1990's when the proposals were first raised. 

We believe we have a full schedule of the archaeological monuments and sites
and since our appointment held meeting with CADW and GGAT to outline our
proposals. In addition, when setting out our initial proposals we have where
possible sought to mitigate or minimise the impact on archaeological sites
or monuments. 

I would stress that the forthcoming exhibitions are intended to inform the
public at this stage of our initial proposals and we intend to listen and
learn from the feedback before we put together our final proposals which
will be in about 12 months time. In the meantime we will continue to consult
and more surveys will be undertaken. 

 

I trust this reply goes some way to reassure you. 

 

Kind regards 

 

Brian Greaves 

 

___________________________

 

Brian Greaves | Community Relations Manager               

 

| 01443 842657 or 07977 140808          

|  <mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]
 | Costain Ltd, 3 Cefn Coed, Parc Nantgarw, Treforest, Rhondda Cynon Taf |
CF15 7QQ

 

[images removed]

 

 

From: Peter King [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 24 October 2011 11:04
To: Brian Greaves
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Clydach Section of A465 dualling

 

My attention was drawn to your consultation on the above.  As someone who
has used the road, I have no doubt that dualling it would in principle be a
good idea, but I am concerned that the list of proposes investigations does
not include an archaeological one.  The present road runs between the site
of the 1790s Clydach Furnaces and the much older Llanelli charcoal furnace
and forge, perhaps later a tinplate works.  Additionally, the valley had a
number of early railways.  Since the Clydach valley did not become heavily
built up in the way that the heads of some of the valleys further west did,
its archaeological potential is higher.  

 

It may be that the highway proposals only have minimal archaeological
implications, but you ought to be commissioning a report in these and if
necessary undertaking measures to mitigate the impact of the road on some
important sites.  The Clydach Furnaces are significant because there are
standing remains.  I suspect that Llanelly Furnace is not at risk at all due
to its location, but associated leats might be, and should be recorded
before destruction.  

 

The forge may also not be at risk, but the same considerations apply.  The
archaeology of finery forges was identified by the Historical Metallurgy
Society as a research priority, as surprisingly little archaeological
research had been done on them.  This is partly because the process they
used was largely abandoned by 1815, and sites have generally been used
subsequently for other purposes.  My recollection that there was
subsequently a tinplate works brings it into that category, but its
investigation, if the site was to be destroyed would still be a priority.  

 

I have used the spelling Llanelly, because it is that found in documents
that I have studied relating to the furnace.  The present one may end in
"i"; I am not sure.  

 

I am copying this to the Chairman of the Historical Metallurgy Society, who
is also their conservation officer.  

 

Dr Peter King (Ph. D. subject - economic history of iron industry)

49, Stourbridge Road, 

Hagley

Stourbridge

West Midlands

DY9 0QS

[log in to unmask]

 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager