Hi Torsten,
I think it's fine.
Cheers,
Andreas
Am 18.10.11 11:11 schrieb "Torsten Ruest" unter <[log in to unmask]>:
>Thanks Benjamin and Andreas for your input. I guess my design is OK with
>the 3rd EV being the confound (ie for the ones with a different imaging
>matrix)? Would be great if you could comment on that as I am a bit
>paranoid and not very experienced setting up these kind of things. See
>attachment.
>
>Benjamin, I tried the GUI first, but for some participants there's no
>fieldmap available so I need to preprocess them individually...
>
>OK thanks in advance and sorry for being such a pedant.
>
>Torsten
>
|