JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives


SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives

SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives


SIDNEY-SPENSER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SIDNEY-SPENSER Home

SIDNEY-SPENSER Home

SIDNEY-SPENSER  October 2011

SIDNEY-SPENSER October 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Release of Edmund Spenser's War on Lord Burghley

From:

Harry Berger Jr <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Sidney-Spenser Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:58:19 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (34 lines)

I'm sure a lot of you will disagree, but it would never occur to me to use this list to promote my own new books.


On Oct 24, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Bruce Danner wrote:

> Fellow Spenserians/Sidneyans:
> 
> My monograph on Spenser's Complaints and the "War on Lord Burghley" has been released in the UK and is slated for release in the USA in the coming weeks. See the extended blurb, below, and read a sample chapter online at the Palgrave book site:
> 
> http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?pid=501332
> 
> Please feel free to forward this on to interested colleagues, lists, and librarians.
> 
> Bruce Danner
> 
> *
> 
> Edmund Spenser’s War on Lord Burghley
> Bruce Danner
> Palgrave Macmillan (2011)
> ISBN-10: 0230299032
> ISBN-13: 978-0230299030
> List Price: $85.00
> 
> 	In February of 1591 Edmund Spenser received the gift of a 50 pound annual pension from the crown, the first of only two such awards ever to be offered to a poet in the Elizabethan era. Granted in the wake of the publication of Spenser’s national epic, The Faerie Queene, this honor conveyed with it the queen’s personal approval, elevating the author to the highest regard among his peers by the regime. Three weeks later, Spenser’s career suddenly fell into crisis. Despite the immanence of his pension, the poet published the Complaints anthology, a work that was swiftly confiscated by the government for its subversive portraits of the court, the institutions of the state, and its particularly scathing allusions to William Cecil, Lord Burghley. This event, described by contemporary Thomas Nashe as a “disgrace,” remains an unsolved mystery at the heart of Spenser’s work, a fall from favor that would alter the course of the poet’s career. What caused these events, and why did Spenser single out Burghley for special criticism, both in the 1591 Complaints and in the second edition of The Faerie Queene in 1596?
> 
> Spenser is still thought to be among the most conservative voices of the Elizabethan period, and few remember him for his repeated attacks on Burghley. These assaults on the Lord Treasurer’s character and judgment, however, rank among the era’s most politically-charged literary writings, provoking the impounding and censorship of the Complaints while deflecting the author from his Virgilian-inspired career as a state laureate. Despite the literary, historical, and biographical significance of these episodes, Spenser’s remarks on Burghley have never been the focus of significant and sustained critique. This study revisits the poet’s public attacks on Elizabeth’s powerful first minister, reassesses the timeline of events that led to them, and argues for their centrality in Spenser’s increased self-definition as a political and cultural outsider. While new historicist arguments have framed the poet in varying degrees of submission or deference to the Elizabethan state, such assessments cannot be reconciled with the Spenser of the Complaints, whose defiance is in no way constrained by his professional self-interest.
> 
> Spenser’s central importance in the art and politics of Elizabethan culture has been offset by a neglect of his life-story by critics and biographers. The last full-length biography of the poet was published in 1945, and while important efforts have increased our understanding of his multiple careers as Virgilian laureate, courtier poet, government administrator, and colonial landowner, many areas of his life remain subject to outdated suppositions or simple inattention to events not connected to his two most famous works, The Shepheardes Calender and The Faerie Queene. Blending the strategies of literary criticism and critical biography, Edmund Spenser’s War on Lord Burghley aims to re-situate the Complaints as a central text of the poet’s career, and to correct the distorted picture of the poet that has emerged by its absence from wider study. In a still widely-influential reading, Stephen Greenblatt defines Spenser as a figure who subordinates himself to state power and its ideological aims. Even in subsequent, more dialectical models of Spenser’s relationship to Elizabethan ideology such as Louis Montrose’s, the poet remains a figure of ambiguous agency against the Elizabethan state and its institutions. And yet the poet’s sustained criticism of Cecil throughout the 1590s reveals an altogether different figure from the one conceived in contemporary scholarship. Such anti-authoritarian gestures demonstrate not only that Spenser possessed a robust internal skepticism of state ideology, but that he also was prepared to challenge openly its most powerful figures and cherished fictions.
> 
> In its original readings and historically-informed focus on the Complaints, the book offers a range of new insights into Spenser’s anthology, challenging prevailing scholarly arguments on the work as a whole as well as perspectives on its individual poems. It debunks the view that Mother Hubberds Tale was written in 1579 during the queen’s marriage crisis, and instead demonstrates new directions of inquiry by illuminating the poem’s context as a work published, received, and censored in 1591. By examining The Ruines of Time within the context of its contemporary reception, the book corrects new critical misreadings of the poem, demonstrating how its incendiary statements on Burghley and Elizabethan patronage culture reveal gestures of defiance and subversion equal to those of Mother Hubberds Tale. Its focus on the 1591 context of the Complaints reconceives the allegory of Virgils Gnat, reimagining Spenser as the memorial figure of the shepherd, and not the powerless gnat, who instead reflects the deteriorating reputation of the late Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester. The book also tests Spenser’s own statements about the origins of Burghley’s displeasure by examining the 1590 Faerie Queene from the perspective of Cecil and his family. In its reading of Burghley’s role in the ouster of Lord Grey as Lord Deputy of Ireland, it connects the Lord Treasurer to the figure of the Blattant Beast in The Faerie Queene, Book 5, a role that complements Spenser’s associations between him and the Beast in Book 6. In this reading William Cecil emerges not merely as an antagonistic reader of Spenser’s epic; by undermining the virtues of both justice and courtesy, Cecil functions as an antagonist to the very epic struggles within Spenser’s own narrative. 
> 
> The range and originality of the book—its revisionist approach to a major canonical figure and its broader engagement with English literary culture of the 1590s—will attract the interest of a wide field of critics and historians. Correcting inaccuracies in the historical record that have stood for a hundred years, it will provoke spirited reaction and debate on a series of critical and biographical questions, and compel the reexamination of texts that have suffered comparative neglect against Spenser’s better known works. Consequently, it will spur new thinking on the literature and culture of the 1590s, and will draw increased attention to the laureate career that Spenser envisioned for himself in The Shepherds Calendar, but failed to achieve with The Faerie Queene. In presenting the most sustained and historically informed focus on the Complaints volume to date, the book disputes accounts of the poet’s mid-career in Richard Rambuss’s Spenser’s Secret Career (Cambridge 1993) and Richard Danson Brown’s ‘The New Poet’ (Liverpool, 1999). While Rambuss in particular works to shape the Complaints into the arc of the poet’s secretarial career, my work explores a bolder, more radical vision of Spenser’s anthology, one in keeping with its being censored from print for over 20 years.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager