JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  October 2011

PHD-DESIGN October 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Are PhDs a threat to design education?

From:

Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:13:17 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (139 lines)

Hello,

The whole of the discussions on current thread  can be viewed differently
through reference to a single unacknowledged fact - the massive change in
the role  of information in design.

All past design practices, methods and approaches were based on designers
being able to produce designs in situations characterised by lack of
information.

The situation has changed. 

Enormous amounts of relevant information and theory are now available for
creating any design, and the generation of and access to this information
and theory is exponentially increasing. This is  the dominant defining
feature  of all current and future design activity. 

There are three  implications:

1.  There is no need to teach designers with the assumption of designers
having an information shortage

2. There is no need for design research, particularly PhDs in Design,  that
assume that design practices are typified by information shortage.

3. The two new important directions in Design  are teaching designers how to
understand and use the large amounts of available relevant information; and,
undertaking research that assumes that, in future, designers will have
access to all relevant information needed to create any design.


Discussion:

A parallel understanding, central to the past of design,  relates to the
role of creativity. 

From observation, the following and its implications are hard to see if one
has spent too long in practices with poor access to useful information. They
are even more difficult to see if one has strong personal investment in
those practices.

 'Creativity  and intuition are the primary tools for creating  solutions
when relevant information is short' 

The corollary, which is what defines design in the future (and currently
except it hasn't been widely perceived) is:

'Where information is available,  creativity  and intuition are
significantly less relevant in design activity and in many cases not
needed.' 


Current contexts of design are marked by availability of enormous amounts of
relevant information for designers - from every discipline

This latter present a paradigmic shift in perspective for understanding
design education, PhDs in design and future design practices.

The discussion on the current threads  look very different in the light of
access to information and reduced relevance of creative abilities to create
something in situations marked by lack of information and  understanding. 

For example,  discussions  about the roles of PhDs in  design education in
the current threads have, as described above, have followed the  path of
assuming designers have little access to information and instead mostly rely
on creativity and intuition.  Evidence  (in both design education and PhDs)
is  the unusually high level of attention that has been given to  improving
design  via  'reflection' on designers and users' creative and intuitive
activities.  This can be seen as a bias against using the large amount of
relevant research-derived information that is readily available from other
fields that applies directly. 

Awareness that the  situation viz-a-viz design and information  has changed
the game defines two groups in this discussion. It is at the heart of Don's
initial post,  and 'avoiding addressing it'  is the defining gestalt of the
responses to it and the ensuing discussion. 

Some have already  understood that the replacement by information-based
design is not only happening,  it has already radically changed design
activity over the last 50 years. Others however, hold tight to the idea that
design activity must be based as in the past on 'creativity' and 'intuition'
and that as such designers do not need to be educated to use the enormous
amount of information and theory that is useful and relevant to design  and
is  now easily accessible.  

The uncritically adopted  assumption that 'creativity' and 'intuition' must
always be central to design has been a seductive and well-reinforced
habituated conditioning for anyone associated with design activity. The
consequence has been an unconscious  habit  and  blinkered way of thinking
that excludes the possibility that design and human functioning in general
changes. It   has resulted in discussions being predicated unthinkingly on
the  false assumption that the old past way of designing, when information
was short, is relevant now.

Design activity  and the context of design practice have changed. Access to
enormous amounts of relevant information and theory is now the defining
factor in understanding and practicing design. This has moved aside  the
need for, and relevance of, the previous obsession with designers' skills in
creativity and intuition.   Instead what is required is improvement in
designers' skills in using information.

This paradigmic shift is very  difficult to address because of the nature of
competence in design , which  fully understood  involves a very large number
of  areas of human action, information and knowing. This may be why the
design field shows strong signs of avoiding addressing it.  It requires that
designers' are able to use the research-derived information from a very
large number of disciplines.  Thus far, the response that has evolved has
had  two parts: 1) the emergence of large numbers of specialised sub-fields
of designers each tied to their field; and 2) the Art and Design response
to ignore the new availability of information and focus on creativity alone.

The better solution is to identify and implement   new forms of
design-related research and practices in which design activity is
characterised by the skills and understanding  for extensive and rapidly
increasing access and use of  relevant information  and theory across all
fields of human endeavour. This will require very different forms of  PhDs
in Design. The expectation that designers will use the information that is
available requires them to understand it. This in turn, requires a major
paradigmic shift in design education.  Currently, PhDs in design are leading
this change.

Best wishes,
Terry

===
Dr Terence Love FDRS, AMIMechE, PMACM, MISI
[log in to unmask]   Mob: +61 434 975 848

Dept of Design
Social  Program Evaluation Research Unit
Edith Cowan University, Western Australia

Dept of Design
Curtin University, Western Australia

Hon Researcher, IEED
Management School, Lancaster University, UK
=== 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager