No, I don't think so. Just the Flickr metadata fields. Does the
attribution tool?
I was concerned that hidden metadata like exif can easily get out of
sync with what is shown on flickr.
Phil
On 27/10/11 16:23, Pat Lockley wrote:
> Did you use exif data?
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Phil Barker<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On 27/10/11 15:26, Steven Stapleton wrote:
>>> For example, a horse uploaded in flickr
>>> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/nottinghamvets/5927688738/in/set-72157626878331180>
>>> with unique code ‘C0004P0038’ can then be searched for by that code in Xpert
>>> <http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/xpert/attribution/index.php?searchterm=C0004P0038>
>>> and by selecting the image with attribution from Xpert you end up with this
>>> <http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/xpert/attribution/pictureattrib/mangle.php?url=http://farm5.static.flickr.com/6004/5927688738_82cd234583_b.jpg&original_url=http://www.flickr.com/63061739@N06/5927688738/&license=flickr_1&flickr_id=5927688738&size=full&picturename=C0004P0038>.
>>> You can then save the image or embed it into PowerPoint.
>> Is there any reason why the photo on Flickr shouldn't have the attribution
>> info on it? I'm not sure if flickr allows you to update photos, but I've
>> worked on a project which uploaded photos + metadata to Flickr through their
>> API, and if Xpert attribution tool (or something based on it) could be put
>> into that workflow then the info could be added during the upload.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu: not so much an operating system as a learning opportunity.
>>
--
Ubuntu: not so much an operating system as a learning opportunity.
|