JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  October 2011

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING October 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: October Theme: Copyright

From:

Armin Medosch <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Armin Medosch <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 3 Oct 2011 09:31:44 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (146 lines)

Jeremy,

thanks for this introduction to a theme which has long been a focus of
my work and  of others with whom I closely collaborate/d. 

First of all I would like to point out a piece of recent writing by Doll
Yoko aka Francesca da Rimini on the very interesting case of the JSTOR
hack: http://www.thenextlayer.org/node/1373

Francesca has published a number of highly interesting articles on
copyright issues on thenextlayer over the years, check her research
journal: http://www.thenextlayer.org/blog/11

Regarding this question: 

"How does an art field such as 'new media art', that is premised on free
exchange, understand its relationship to the intangible public domain of
intellectual property as presently recognised and enforced through the
law?"

In 2001 exactly 10 years ago kingdom-of-piracy (KOP) was launched in
Taiwan, an experimental curatorial project initiated jointly by Shu Lea
Cheang, Yukiko Shikata and me. Based on an initial commission by Acer
Digital Arts Center, KOP set out to ask exactly that question (above) by
commissioning 12 net art works and 3 essays on the subject. Initially
warm relationships with ADAC declined after a change of directorship
there and the new director tried to force a name change which was
resisted by the curators. KOP was nevertheless able to finish and
launched at Ars Electronica 2002. All documentation of KOP can be found
here. http://kop.kein.org/

KOP then set out on an intellectual and artistic journey, becoming a
"floating kingdom" and anchoring at different institutions, at DEAF
2003, at FACT 2003, contributing to its launch and producing DIVE, a
booklet and CD ROM which introduced cultural organisations to the world
of open source and copyleft collaborations. Maybe some copies of DIVE
are still left in the vaults of FACT, otherwise try this
http://kop.kein.org/DIVE/index.html

KOP increasingly changed it's character from a curatorial project to a
project that mixed curating with interventionist art practices and
research. The exploration of the open seas of open code and free content
increasingly led us to a closer engagement with issues of
self-governance such as rule making or the processes that govern speech
acts in collective decision making and agenda development, until, after
involvement at open congress 2005 and node.l 2006, kop did not formally
stop but entered a prolonged break during which participants followed
their own paths ... I trained my piratic glass-eye on PhD thesis
development. 

This year it is KOP's 10 years anniversary and it would have been nice
to celebrate that somehow, however, there is still time, since the
official project launch was in December 2001 at Museum ofContemporary
Art, Taipai, Taiwan. 

regards
Armin


On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 20:16 +0100, Jeremy Pilcher wrote:
> This month’s theme on the list is copyright and is guest hosted by Jeremy Pilcher, whose academic work explores the connections between art and law and builds on his professional experience as a lawyer.
> 
> The lack of opposition from the United Kingdom to the recent extension by the European Union of copyright on sound recordings (from 50 to 70 years) has once again brought into question whether there is the political will to update the UK’s labyrinthine intellectual property environment. It is just one of the more recent examples of the increased scope of intellectual property rights (IPRs) around the globe.
> 
> In the UK this has occured despite a number of independent inquiries, of which the most recent is the Hargreaves Review, which concluded that the current legal framework obstructs innovation and growth.
> 
> Lawrence Lessig, one of the founders of Creative Commons and professor at Stanford Law School has observed, at some point the commercial life of creative property comes to an end. After that period the ongoing existence of much culture will be uncertain and considerably affected by how it is recycled and archived.
> 
> While technology has reduced the economic costs of generating and preserving culture, legal barriers remain. Professor Susan M Pearce has observed museums and galleries are integrated into capitalist economic practices. IPRs, including copyright, are of considerable significance to ‘new media art’.
> 
> Many questions arise, including:
> 
> · Has the ubiquity of the web made assertions that museum and gallery collections are somehow ‘outside’ the market-place even less convincing than before?
> 
> · How are curators and artists working internationally supposed to be able to comply with copyright when laws vary between countries?
> 
> · What methods can be used to improve understanding about IPRs and in what ways could education engage critically with the values underlying, and implicit in, copyright?
> 

> 
> · How does the acquisition of data and the creation of meaning by corporations, which use IPRs to protect the commercial value of such information, relate to the freedom of expression and art/activist practices that seek to subvert, or even obstruct, the free flow of information?
> 
> · In what respects do the interests of commercial organisations such as Google, which exist for the purpose of making profit, differ from those of artists, museums and galleries and in what ways should the law respond to any such differences?
> 
> · Should the reform of IPRs, and in particular copyright, take place in the name of innovation and economic growth?
> 
> This month's theme is also tied to the launch of the book Public Domain published by SAW Video in Canada, which documents six new artistic single channel moving image works made with copyright free material from Library and Archives Canada. Sarah Cook is an invited essayist in the book and last year undertook a month long residency with SAW Video grappling with these issues. http://www.sawvideo.com/projects/publicdomain/index-en.php
> 
> Those who have joined the list as invited respondents to discuss the theme are:
> 
> Sarah Andrew
> Artist and lawyer Sarah Andrew has for many years combined her two practices to advise on terrestrial and digital TV programme content. The law is seen by Andrew as a 'system of description', and she believes that artists and lawyers should work together to empower artists to find new ways of working.
> 
> Bronac Ferran
> Bronac Ferran is a guest curator at The Ruskin Gallery Cambridge and works also in Communications department at the RCA. She set up Boundaryobject.org in April 2007. It has a focus on research in areas of art, science, technology, law, media and cultural production. Bronac was formerly Director of Interdisciplinary Arts at Arts Council England where she led national policy for interdisciplinary and collaborative arts practice, often involving media, science, law and other disciplines. She was a member of the influential Adelphi Charter commission on IP, organised the CODE conference about open source and innovation in 2001.
> 
> Joy Garnett
> Joy Garnett [ http://joygarnett.com ] is an artist who lives in Brooklyn, NY. Her paintings, based on found images of explosive or catastrophic events, locate instances of the apocalyptic sublime in mass media culture. Her social media projects, documented with photographs and archived online, examine the intersections of our digital and material worlds. She is the Arts Editor of the contemporary media journal Cultural Politics, published by Duke University Press, as well as the blog NEWSgrist  [ http://newsgrist.com ]. 
> 
> Penny McCann
> Penny is the Director of SAW Video, a media art centre located in Ottawa, Canada.
>  http://www.sawvideo.com/programming/spotlight.
> 
> Rob Myers
> Rob Myers is an artist, writer and hacker based in Peterborough in the UK. He has been making work remixing cultural and technological codes since the early 1990s and has recently made 3D printable models of iconic postmodern artworks freely available for download.
> http://robmyers.org/
> 
> Taylor Nuttall
> Is CEO of folly, which is a leading digital arts organisation working across England’s North West. folly presents an active artistic programme that provides creative interaction and collaboration between artists and the wider public using technology. Taylor is a founding director of Abandon Normal Devices Ltd and has has a background as a practicing artist, educator and in commercial enterprise.
> 
> Marta Peirano
> Marta Pierano, is a Spanish writer and curator.
> 
> Matthew Poole
> Matthew Poole is currently Programme Director of Essex’s Centre for Curatorial Studies and Director of the MA in Gallery Studies & Critical Curating at the University of Essex. As well as lecturing, Matthew works as a freelance curator and collaborates with a wide variety of contemporary artists. He has experience working for a number of arts organisations and galleries both in the public and private sectors.
> 
> Fred Poyner IV
> Fred Poyner IV is the Digital Collections Curator for the Washington State Historical Society, and has managed the rights clearances and image collections licensing program for WSHS since 2006. Prior to joining WSHS in 2006, he served as an arts collections specialist for CORBIS in Seattle, WA.
> http://research.washingtonhistory.org/research.aspx
> 
> Michael Szpakowski
> Michael Szpakowski is an artist, composer and writer.
> 
> Kalliopi Vacharopoulou
> Dr Vacharopoulou has a background in Archaeology, Museum Studies and Heritage Management and Conservation. For the last few years she worked in digital imaging projects, exploring relevant themes with a particular focus on copyright issues. Current interests focus on the application of digital technologies in the museum and heritage sector and in education (digitisation of heritage content, digital media, e-learning, electronic publishing and visual resources).
> 
> Annette Ward
> Scottish Power Research Fellow and Development Manager, has evaluated retrieval software at London Guildhall Library and Art Gallery, The British Library, and BBC.  She has over 25 years as an academic in textiles, clothing, and design in US and India.
> 
> Annsley Merelle Ward
> is an intellectual property and media litigator at London-based firm Collyer Bristow LLP, specializing in intellectual property with specialized emphasis in multi-jurisdictional intellectual property issues in the cultural heritage, technology and fashion sectors. She writes for award-winning intellectual property blog, IPKat.
>  
> Patricia Watts
> Patricia Watts has researched art and nature practitioners since 1994. Patricia Watts is founder and west coast curator of ecoartspace. She is currently working on a statewide residency project in New Mexico entitled Getting Off the Planet (2011-2013). Watts was Chief Curator at the Sonoma County Museum from 2005-2008.
> http://www.gettingofftheplanet.org/
> http://ecoartspace.org/index.html
> 
> Kate Wilson
> Having trained as a film producer in Los Angeles at Jodie Foster's Egg Pictures and Paul Thomas Anderson's Ghoulardi Film Company, Kate Wilson returned to London to study law and join the bar.  She now represents artists and organisations across the world, helping to determine the best way to exploit or preserve the rights in their work.  Kate works with artists and organisations in all media.
> 
> It is hoped that a little later on, one or two others will also be able to join as invited respondents, including Shady El Noshokaty, an Egyptian artist and curator, who recently spoke at Rewire/Abandon Normal Devices.
> 
> Shady El Noshokaty spoke of exciting work done Egypt, including that of Ahmed Basiony. Some of Basiony's work is currently being exhibited in Liverpool as part of Abandon Normal Devices and FACT. Sadly, Basiony was killed during the Egyptian uprising.
> http://www.noshokaty.com/
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager