JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  October 2011

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING October 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Copyright - public domain

From:

Jeremy Pilcher <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Jeremy Pilcher <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 5 Oct 2011 07:57:29 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (40 lines)

The posts on this theme for me so far have been fascinating. My apologies Penny! I forgot to put in the updated link, which, it won't hurt to say again, is http://sawvideo.com/programming/spotlight 

I am intrigued by the connections I see between the comment by Penny:

"It was a frustrating, fascinating, and ultimately
rewarding experience for the artists, and one that highlighted the
problematic relationship between artists and institutional gatekeepers of
archival holdings.  For instance, public domain materials supposedly "free
of copyright" still had donor restrictions placed on them, often by other
national institutions.  The question that rose from this project was: just
how "public" is the public domain anyway? "

And Armin's elaboration on his work with Kingdom of Piracy (KOP), when he says:

"because the process how a group
of people defines the rules that govern their collaboration runs
obviously thrugh language. Part of the lessons learned from the
"everything open" paradigm (or liberal utopia) is that there can be a
kind of false egalitarianism. While supposedly everybody is free and
equal to participate in a collaborative process often there is a
pre-defined agenda which pretty much determines what can be said. Those
who define the agenda "win" the discussion often without even having to
raise an argument."

Daniel McClean (in 'Dear Images') has argued copyright has not "always been a a necessary mechanism for artists" and many of the conventions and property relations of the art world exist "independently of legal norms". Although McClean references Foucault, Armin's post reminds me of Lyotard's language games or 'phrases'. As I understand it, he argues that to do justice means resisting allowing some language games from providing the rules for other games, and so becoming a metalanguage. 

It seems to me the law seeks to assert itself as a metalanguage but when it comes to art is conflicted and tries to avoid engaging with aesthetics, whether in copyright or in other areas. Although,  of course even for those within the 'art world', aesthetics are not un-problematic. Duchamp's work catalysed many of the issues and, as hardly needs to be said, they are still being engaged with. Indeed, Sean Cubitt made a passing reference to this in his keynote at ISEA.

However, at this point I elect to go off on a direction that is suggested by Penny's comments. Corporations, particularly given their role in globalisation, are being challenged to be more socially responsible. It seems to me The influence and impact of large galleries and museums also invites critical examination. In 2003 Sir Anthony Mason set out to “examine the extent to which the law allows moral claims and values to inform the exercise of powers by those who control and manage charitable and public institutions, notably museums and galleries, in relation to their holdings” (‘Ethical Dilemmas for Charities: Museums and the Conscionable Disposal of Art’). 

While Sir Anthony’s comments were directed specifically at the repatriation of art works and other objects the same question could also be used as a starting point from which to examine and discuss the way copyright is employed by museums (to generate much needed revenue amongst other things). One direction such a discussion could take is indicated by the call by the ‘Artists’ Bill of Rights Campaign’ <http://artists-bill-of-rights.org/>. 

Under the heading ‘Concerns with the Hargreaves Review of Copyright’ the Campaign notes that “The moral rights of authors are not automatically granted as in other EU countries”. In light of the announcement by the UK Business, Innovation and Skills Committee of its intention to conduct an inquiry into the Hargreaves Review and the Government’s response to that Review the Campaign urges, “Every creative should make a submission, the deadline is 5th September 2011”. 

Of course the question of the moral rights is not new. The debate which springs to my mind is that over Richard Serra's 'Tilted Arc', which he understood to have been destroyed when it was removed from the Plaza for which it had been constructed. 

Best
Jeremy
http://independent.academia.edu/JeremyPilcher

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager