JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  October 2011

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING October 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Further invited respondents and Kingdom of Piracy

From:

Juha Huuskonen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Juha Huuskonen <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:50:44 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (134 lines)

Hello Aymeric, Armin, Jon,

Some brief comments to the discussion, I will try to
(at least partly) answer Aymeric's question as well -

>
> Yet in your original post, you are "zooming" into a precise moment in
> time:
>
>> By the turn of the millennium there was a lot of excitement about the
>> possibilities of media art and free software and open content. The  
>> tone
>> had been set by the Wizards of OS conference in Berlin 1999, to my
>> knowledge the first event to ask "how can methodologies from free and
>> open source software development be applied to other domains, such as
>> content production and media art."
>
> This is precisely within this particular time range that my question  
> was
> framed. In your opinion, what is it concretely that artists and
> intellectuals found attractive in free software and open content?
> Despite all the proto-copyleft practices they might have been been
> experiencing with, what is it in the free software copyleft that
> suddenly seems to be so exciting and novel from an artistic  
> perspective?
>


Firstly, about the specific time period of late 90s / early 2000s -

I thought that this was a very interesting time period, in the sense  
that
the potential of social / networked media had not really been discovered
by mainstream media and big corporations but there was a lot of
grassroot activism and technology development going on in that domain.

Some years ago I started to work on a piece of text that would describe
some of the key characteristics of this era and through many twists and
turns in my research process I ended up reading a lot of texts from
the 1920s and 30s. I've mostly studied a Finnish author Olavi  
Paavolainen
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olavi_Paavolainen) and the group around
him called Tulenkantajat ('The Flame Bearers'). In short - Olavi & co
were curious about the difference between the reality presented in
the official media (books + newspapers) and the reality in flyers that
were posted around the cities and given from hand to hand. They
were also inspired by the writings of D.H. Lawrence and the fact that
since his 'explicit' texts were not published by companies, he was
just publishing and disseminating the books himself and there were
pirated copies of his books sold in many stores. They were also
inspired by Georges Duhamel, who in his book Défense des Lettres was
concerned about the fact that various image and sound based medias
and 'machines' would take the place of books in the society.

I won't dive deeper into this direction but the basic point I wanted to
make is that the 'Roaring' 20s might offer an interesting comparison
point to 'Dot Com Boom' 90s, in terms of technological / cultural  
development
and the political climate. I'm currently reading some of Rodchenko's
own writings, comparing them with contemporary texts about 'hacker  
ethics'.

And to comment more specifically Aymeric's question about why
copyleft license has been popular amongst artists -

For the past 10 years I was involved in organising Pixelache festival
(I've just left that post) and we often had discussions about what are
uniting factors of Pixelache participants.... and in my opinion the best
answer we came up with was that people share a similar 'attitude'
or 'approach' to how (creative) work should be done, and how this
should also affect the logic of our organisations and even our  
societies.
Some thoughts related to this came out from Digital Craftsmanship  
seminar
we organised in 2009 (http://www.juhuu.nu/?p=31). Also the wikipedia
definition of Critical Design (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_design 
)
is related to this.

About this attitude - I recently visited mobilityshifts conference in  
NYC
(mobilityshifts.org) where Florian Cramer gave a presentation (the  
presentation
was recorded, the recording are going to be online soon, I hope).  
Florian
compared the content and aesthetics of Occupy Wall Street and
Steve Jobs memorials - the messages and aesthetics were strikingly  
similar.
The main point of his talk (which dealt with education) in my  
understanding
was that the characteristics of 'rebel entrepreneurs' / 'activist  
investors' and
'resilient' / 'struggling' activists are both embracing the idea that  
as individuals
we have to learn to survive in tough conditions, that we have to have  
control
over the tools we use, that we need open structures that can adapt to  
new
situations. Florian's presentation was a kind of 'warning' for  
activists - that
we should be more specific about what structures should become more
open and in what way.

So, finally, to get back to Aymerics question... The reason(s) why  
artists want
to use copyleft might be:
1 - Since there has been a great genuine transformation in information
technologies, some artists might find that using copyleft gives some
concrete positive benefits (I think this group is a small minority)
2 - Artists might find copyleft licence to be a way to associate their
work with certain discourses / attitudes / organisations / people,
so instead of a licensing model it's used as a kind of brand
3 - Artists might use copyleft in the hope that it's a better way to
protect their work from commercial exploitation (and most of them have
nothing to loose since they are not generating income via copyrights  
anyway)

The options (2) and (3) are related to Florian's presentation -
there are currently tons of artists/designers out there who don't have a
way to make their living in the traditional domain of copyrights
and big companies, and therefore they are (more or less desperately)
associating themselves with all kinds of 'open' and 'collaborative'  
labels,
tools and platforms.... In some cases this is the best solution, in
some cases people should fight for the steady jobs and structures
that exist and not be willing to work for free and/or in unbearably
flexible conditions.

Best,

Juha.

.: [log in to unmask] :: www.juhuu.nu :: +358 40 570 96 17 :.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager