JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  October 2011

CCP4BB October 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Archiving Images for PDB Depositions

From:

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:33:21 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (65 lines)

Pilot phase, opt-in--eventually, mandatory? Like structure factors?

Jacob



On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Adrian Goldman
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I have no problem with this idea as an opt-in. However I loathe being forced to do things - for my own good or anyone else's. But unless I read the tenor of this discussion completely wrongly, opt-in is precisely what is not being proposed.
>
> Adrian Goldman
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 31 Oct 2011, at 18:02, Jacob Keller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Crystallographers,
>>
>> I am sending this to try to start a thread which addresses only the
>> specific issue of whether to archive, at least as a start, images
>> corresponding to PDB-deposited structures. I believe there could be a
>> real consensus about the low cost and usefulness of this degree of
>> archiving, but the discussion keeps swinging around to all levels of
>> archiving, obfuscating who's for what and for what reason. What about
>> this level, alone? All of the accompanying info is already entered
>> into the PDB, so there would be no additional costs on that score.
>> There could just be a simple link, added to the "download files"
>> pulldown, which could say "go to image archive," or something along
>> those lines. Images would be pre-zipped, maybe even tarred, and people
>> could just download from there. What's so bad?
>>
>> The benefits are that sometimes there are structures in which
>> resolution cutoffs might be unreasonable, or perhaps there is some
>> potential radiation damage in the later frames that might be
>> deleterious to interpretations, or perhaps there are ugly features in
>> the images which are invisible or obscure in the statistics.
>>
>> In any case, it seems to me that this step would be pretty painless,
>> as it is merely an extension of the current system--just add a link to
>> the pulldown menu!
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Jacob Keller
>>
>> --
>> *******************************************
>> Jacob Pearson Keller
>> Northwestern University
>> Medical Scientist Training Program
>> email: [log in to unmask]
>> *******************************************
>>
>



-- 
*******************************************
Jacob Pearson Keller
Northwestern University
Medical Scientist Training Program
email: [log in to unmask]
*******************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager