JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EMPLOYABILITY-DEVELOPMENT Archives


EMPLOYABILITY-DEVELOPMENT Archives

EMPLOYABILITY-DEVELOPMENT Archives


EMPLOYABILITY-DEVELOPMENT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EMPLOYABILITY-DEVELOPMENT Home

EMPLOYABILITY-DEVELOPMENT Home

EMPLOYABILITY-DEVELOPMENT  September 2011

EMPLOYABILITY-DEVELOPMENT September 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: extra-curricular activities and employability

From:

Michael Binder <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Michael Binder <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:15:46 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Hi,



A practical question.  I have looked at the STARS site and need to log in.  Anyone know the process?



Mike



Education Studies

Bradford College



-----Original Message-----

From: List for UK HEI employability developers [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cotton, Dave

Sent: 19 September 2011 13:40

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: extra-curricular activities and employability



What will happen to STARS when the initial 3 year hosting period provided by the CETL projects expires ?



Dave



Senior Careers Adviser

Sheffield Hallam



-----Original Message-----

From: List for UK HEI employability developers [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nortcliffe, Anne

Sent: 19 September 2011 08:58

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: extra-curricular activities and employability



Hi,



I use STAR to help students think about their answers for killer questions in application forms, help students to reflect upon their extra curriculum activities and studies to provide supporting evidence To their questions.



Best wishes,

Anne



Sent from my iPhone



On 18 Sep 2011, at 12:20, "Arti Kumar" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



> 

> Dear Sharon (and other colleagues),

> you may be interested in a web-based employability resource that was produced as part of a collaborative CETL project, by University of Bedfordshire, Sheffield Hallam and the Open University. It is called STARS and is based on the STAR formula that employers often use in assessing applications - i.e. they expect to see specific evidence of the attributes they are seeking through applicant examples that refer to Situation, Tasks, Actions, Results (apologies to all those who detest acronyms!) It is an interactive resource that requires users (students and recent graduates) to consider our guidance and examples but also give their own personal examples of specific situations (mostly extra- or co-curricular) in which they have performed job tasks and taken individual actions that produced results and developed a range of skills.

> 

> The resource should be available at www.starsprocess.ac.uk<http://www.starsprocess.ac.uk/>  - but it was left somewhat in limbo when the CETLs ended, although our 3 HEIs did want to make it widely available across the HE sector. We disseminated at the time and wrote an article about STARS in the journal On Reflection. I am attaching info which will give more detail.

> 

> Best wishes,

> Arti

> 

> 

> 

> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

> 

> ________________________________

> From: List for UK HEI employability developers on behalf of Milner, 

> Sharon

> Sent: Mon 9/12/2011 17:28

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: extra-curricular activities and employability

> 

> Hi everyone

> I was wondering has anyone come across any recent material linking the benefits of students engaging in extra-curricular activity to enhance their employability?

> Any contributions would be gratefully received Best wishes Sharon

> 

> 

> -------------------------------------------

> Dr Sharon Milner BA PhD CPsychol

> Employability Development Manager

> Room 2F01

> University of Ulster

> Shore Rd

> Newtownabbey

> BT37 0QB

> 

> Tel: 028 90368038

> Email: [log in to unmask]

> web: http://employability.ulster.ac.uk

> 

> From: List for UK HEI employability developers 

> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ruth 

> Lawton

> Sent: 21 July 2011 11:22

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: Graduates aren't what they used to be ...

> 

> Thanks Andrea – the link to the original is here: 

> http://www.workcomms.com/graduates/whitepapers/graduates/

> 

> Best wishes all

> Ruth

> 

> Ruth Lawton

> University Teaching Fellow for Employability Centre for the 

> Enhancement of Learning and Teaching Birmingham City University

> 0121 331 5126

> 

> [log in to unmask]

> 

> http://www2.bcu.ac.uk/celt/employability-personal-development

> http://www2.bcu.ac.uk/futureproof

> 

> 

> 

> 

> From: List for UK HEI employability developers 

> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Harris, 

> Andrea L

> Sent: 20 July 2011 10:25

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: Graduates aren't what they used to be ...

> 

> Hi

> It’s by someone called Simon Howard and it’s published in full on Work Comms – a recruitment agency – which is why it’s top level. I’m not sure if they did the research themselves or if they paid for some.

> Andrea

> 

> Andrea Harris | Education Partnerships Manager

> 

> Office days :

> Tuesdays : Rm 308 . Millennium House | ext. 66320 Wednesdays : Rm 6 . 

> River House | ext. 63638

> 

> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> From: List for UK HEI employability developers 

> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ruth 

> Lawton

> Sent: 15 July 2011 15:14

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Re: Graduates aren't what they used to be ...

> 

> Hi all

> 

> Good point Jeff - I am assuming it came from Targetjobs / GTI 

> http://targetjobs.co.uk/ or their parent company http://groupgti.com/

> 

> Happy Friday all

> Ruth

> 

> Ruth Lawton

> University Teaching Fellow for Employability Centre for the 

> Enhancement of Learning and Teaching Birmingham City University

> 0121 331 5126

> 

> [log in to unmask]

> 

> http://www2.bcu.ac.uk/celt/employability-personal-development

> http://www2.bcu.ac.uk/futureproof

> 

> 

> 

> 

> From: Waldock, Jeff [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

> Sent: 15 July 2011 15:08

> To: Ruth Lawton; [log in to unmask]

> Subject: RE: Graduates aren't what they used to be ...

> 

> This make very interesting reading!  Do we know the source of the data quoted?

> 

> From: List for UK HEI employability developers 

> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ruth 

> Lawton

> Sent: 15 July 2011 14:59

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Subject: Graduates aren't what they used to be ...

> 

> Hello everyone

> 

> A colleague here at BCU has just circulated this and I have her permission to share it with you. It makes fascinating reading – and reflecting!

> ________________________________________

> 

> This paper was recently delivered at a Target Jobs Breakfast meeting attended by key graduate recruiters and university careers services:

> Graduates aren't what they used to be

> Generational White Paper 22nd June 2011 The higher education system 

> changed dramatically during the 1990s. Hiring managers aged over 40 will remember a very different place to that which exists at the universities we are hiring from today. They will also have experienced a radically different graduate recruitment marketplace, where a far smaller number graduated and were entering elite management fast-track schemes, rather than the large-scale hiring of today. If you've heard someone comment that graduate recruitment isn't what it used to be, they are absolutely right.

> ________________________________

> By the numbers: 1980 vs 2011

> It’s bigger. There are:

> 

> *   Three times as many universities (42 -> 115)

> *   Four times* as many graduates (68,000 -> 292,000)

> *   Six times as many enter graduate employment (33,700 -> 180,000)

> The gender balance has also changed, from 63% male in 1980 to 54% female today.

> Grades have changed too:

> 

> *   More A Levels are awarded an A grade (9% -> 25%)

> *   Fewer A Levels are failed (32% -> 2.5%)

> *   Nearly twice as many get a 2:1 or 1st (35% ->65%)

> * To put that in perspective, the largest 14 universities now produce more graduates than the entire system did in 1980.

> ________________________________

> The old milkround vs today's mass hiring In this very different world, 

> graduate recruitment was also very different. The fore-runner to today’s Association of Graduate Recruiters was SCOEG - The Standing Conference of Employers of Graduates. It had a strict code of conduct, built on the idea the graduate recruitment should not interfere with the studies of students, including:

> 

> *   No personal contact during the Michaelmas term (leading to the birth of the graduate employment presentation)

> *   No second interviews during the Lent term

> *   Strictly no job offers before Easter (although it’s clear some were already flouting this regulation)

> It’s also enlightening to review some of the findings of their annual survey from 1980:

> 

> *   The hardest areas to recruit were engineering and IT. No change there.

> *   The highest payers were the manufacturing firms, and the accountancy firms were the lowest payers. “Financial services” was a lowly 10th out of 13 sectors on pay.

> 

> ________________________________

> The graduate jobs market

> Using recent figures from employers, we’ve broken down the jobs available to graduates into a few very broad classifications:

> Only 2% of graduates who enter employment, or 1% of all graduates, actually enter an elite graduate programme, but we’d suggest that many graduate recruitment programmes are still based on advertising and systems originally intended for a small elite. Many of today’s programmes are roles which were not historically “graduate jobs”, and this leads to some unfortunate differences between the expectations of employers and graduates.

> ________________________________

> The student perspective

> We surveyed 2,500 students, to understand what their expectations were for entering employment. Only a minority expect to get a place on a recognised graduate scheme and their pessimism grows as they go through university; 40% of those graduating in 2013 expect to do so, versus just 34% of those in their final year and about to graduate.

> We defined an elite group of those who do expect to get onto a graduate scheme, also expect to get a 2:1 or 1st, and are graduating within the next three years.

> They were extremely realistic – even a little unambitious – on salary, 

> with over half expecting to earn £25,000 or less. Over half also think the top graduate schemes pay £30,000 or more, but only 2% identified that some schemes will pay in excess of £40,000 They also expect to leave fairly rapidly. Although 98% expect to be with you after a year, this drops to 76% after two years, 44% after three, and just 18% after three years. Given that AGR members expect graduates to stay for 6 years, this shows a significant gap between employers and the graduate talent they are hiring.

> ________________________________

> Graduate expectations versus employment realities One of the most 

> interesting aspects of this survey was in exploring career development. It’s a hot issue for those looking for careers, and every employer makes some general promises. But we wanted to understand the speed and pace of that development. We asked:

> 

> *   How fast do you expect to manage people?

> 43% said within a year, rising to 77% within two years.

> AGR employers said 2.5 years.

> *   How fast do you expect to manage projects?

> 15% said immediately, rising to 57% within a year.

> AGR employers said 2 years.

> *   How fast do you expect to manage budgets?

> 69% said within two years, rising to 86% within three years.

> AGR employers said 3.3 years

> *   How fast do you expect to work autonomously?

> 29% said immediately, rising to 66% within a year AGR employers said 

> 1.5 years.

> The disparity is clear, and employers need to think very carefully about how they manage the expectations of top graduate talent to ensure they are not rapidly disenchanted after joining.

> ________________________________

> Conclusion

> We’d offer six observations from this research:

> 

> *   There is a gulf of understanding between the “graduate” world of many hiring managers and the graduate world of today. Graduates are, indeed, not what they used to be.

> *   Graduates’ financial expectations are more realistic than their work expectations.

> *   Only a tiny minority of today’s graduates will end up in “graduate jobs”, thus questioning further the need for so many university places.

> *   Many graduate recruitment tools were designed to attract and identify the “elite”, but only 1% of graduates will ever end up joining it

> *   Employers need to offer more routes to entry, beyond graduate schemes.

> *   Non-elite graduate recruitment needs to be done differently.

> 

> Ruth Lawton

> University Learning & Teaching Fellow for Employability Centre for the 

> Enhancement of Learning & Teaching Birmingham City University City 

> North Campus

> (0121 331) 5126

> [log in to unmask]

> 

> http://www2.bcu.ac.uk/celt/employability-personal-development

> http://www2.bcu.ac.uk/futureproof

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email 

> Security System.

> 

> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email 

> Security System.

> 

> Arti Kumar MBE

> Honorary Visiting Research Fellow

> and National Teaching Fellow

> 

> <Issue19 On Reflection, with STARS article.pdf>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
June 2023
April 2023
March 2023
January 2023
May 2022
April 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
April 2021
February 2021
January 2021
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
February 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager