On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Joel Davis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Can't do any of them. But Puttenham's "entertangle" and "envelope" diagrams
> are so elaborate that you'd think that as soon as anyone had our notation
> system it would replace PUttenham's clunky alternative. JBD
Exactly. I was looking at those diagrams today, and that's when I got
suspicious. I find Michael Hetherington's suggestions pretty
convincing.
--
Dr. David Wilson-Okamura http://virgil.org [log in to unmask]
English Department Virgil reception, discussion, documents, &c
East Carolina University Sparsa et neglecta coegi. -- Claude Fauchet
|