JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  September 2011

PHD-DESIGN September 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Design Policy?; was: Design Policy in Canada Masters Research

From:

Danielle Bushore <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:02:26 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (113 lines)

Peter, Gunnar & Derek,

Thank you for your responses. All of your resources are accurate accounts of
what a design policy might entail- independent of Canadian politics and
policy structure that is. It would be really great if we could continue this
discussion on my blog site at www.designpolicycanada.com. I'm interested in
these concepts of policy and your ideas of whether or not these same ideas/
theories would be possible in the Canadian climate. The blog is like any
other, but in order for me to use your thoughts and ideas, I need your
consent, like any other research. There is a link on the site for this.

There are a number of reasons for proposing a policy that includes most
design sectors in Canada. Combined, these sectors encompass a large body,
much larger than independent associations and together they contribute a
great deal to the Canadian economy. Most policy is derived through proof of
cost-benefit. Rather than establish a way to calculate this quantitatively,
I'm creating a discussion about it. Throughout my research, I've found it
interesting that while the Canadian government supports innovation and the
arts, it does little to support or promote design.

A 'policy' is a word that is often used to mean different things. It scares
some people, makes others wary or skeptical. It's meaning is derived from
anything that the government chooses to do or not to do- though there are
many accounts of what policy really is and all vary slightly. If the
Canadian Government chose to recognize and support design education and
provided a monetary interest in research and bettering the creative economy,
it would be my understanding that this is a policy.

I hope this helps to explain a bit more about my thesis. It is centred more
around the actual discussion and opinions of professionals who have much
more experience in the industry than I. If you are skeptical that any sort
of government interest in the design industry would be of benefit, I would
like to hear about it and why. I posted the first question yesterday- it's
very general but I thought it could get the discussion going. I'll be
posting a new topic every week that will be based on the responses and
arguments posed in the previous topic/question. I also have some links on
the home page that demonstrate some great examples of initiatives that
different countries have in place.

Your expertise would be greatly appreciated and I look forward to hearing
anything else you would like to contribute at:
www.designpolicycanada.com

Sincerely,

Danielle Bushore
MDES Student
Carleton University
Ottawa ON



On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Peter Jones | Redesign <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Gunnar - Dori Tunstall's work in the US Design Policy
> http://www.designpolicy.org/ comes to mind.
>
> The UK Design Council has been a design clearinghouse for their development
> of the field, for many years:
> http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/insight/policy/
>
> Not having worked with these kinds of initiatives, I'm skeptical of the
> focus of a "design policy." I'm in Toronto and I have trouble imagining
> what
> the federal government would support as a design policy, and I'd at least
> prefer to wait until there was a non-conservative government overseeing the
> executive functions before initiating policy discussions (so perhaps
> research for the next 2-3 years here is good!)  Does this mean Canadian
> design as an industry consortium?
>
> I find the practices of design too wide-ranging, dynamic, and disparate to
> have a meaningful sense of policy at the national level. I'm not sure other
> design professionals or policy makers even understand what the purposes
> are.
>
>
> I would prefer to focus on policy functions well understood in government.
> Funding mandates would be useful for education (post-secondary design
> education) and research (design research at the PhD level has very little
> funding, as it does not fit scientific mandates).
>
> Peter
>
> Peter Jones, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor, Faculty of Design
> Strategic Foresight and Innovation
> OCAD University
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gunnar Swanson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 8:48 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Design Policy?; was: Design Policy in Canada Masters Research
>
> I'm never quite sure what people have in mind when they use the phrase
> "design policy." Can anyone point me to a relatively terse description?
>
>
> Gunnar
> ----------
> Gunnar Swanson Design Office
> 1901 East 6th Street
> Greenville NC 27858
> USA
>
> [log in to unmask]
> +1 252 258 7006
>
> http://www.gunnarswanson.com
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager