Thanks Stephen, it turns out that it's just a bug that does no harm, can be ignored and will be solved in the next update.
Scott
On 2 Aug 2011, at 08:18, Stephen J. Fromm wrote:
> You're correct: VY is for the data, and I'd presume it's not necessary for design only.
>
> I haven't had time to trace through the code to see how you can get anything out of spm_DesRep without VY being defined, or why it's needed and you get the error, but it seems pretty likely that if you can see the matrix orthogonality piece, then it's valid, regardless of this error coming up.
>
|