-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear ANU,
I cannot follow the link to your picture, but one reason might be
different algorithms in the two different programs for the secondary
structure prediction. I am usually not too impressed by the suggestions
that pymol make and you should always check the secondary structure
prediction against your biochemical knowledge, at least to confirm the
boundaries.
Cheers, Tim
On 08/22/2011 03:01 PM, Anuradha Balasubramanian wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have a problem . i crystallized same protein in two different pH and when
> viewing the results a important beta hairpin seems extended in PyMOL .
> (image link below).
> https://picasaweb.google.com/anu4884/August222011?authuser=0&feat=directlink
> But analysis of hairpin in promotif shows that they are similar with same
> H-bonds.
> What can be the reason for such ambiguity?
>
> Regards
>
> ANU
>
- --
- --
Dr Tim Gruene
Institut fuer anorganische Chemie
Tammannstr. 4
D-37077 Goettingen
GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFOUmGnUxlJ7aRr7hoRAmntAKCbLfoH0LWCUb8VZR6QbAhS4+EpxgCfXS9H
wqLCwS0veRSFMgDZeE1UMFg=
=UeAU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|