JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FSL Archives


FSL Archives

FSL Archives


FSL@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FSL Home

FSL Home

FSL  August 2011

FSL August 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: TBSS exception

From:

Mark Jenkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

FSL - FMRIB's Software Library <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 20 Aug 2011 08:23:24 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (46 lines)

Dear Christine,

We have been *extremely* careful about the left-right issue in FSL and have gone to a great deal of trouble to test and verify the fact that FSL will not flip data.  So this is *NOT* something that people need to worry about. I have not seen any instance of this problem and I have done a *lot* of checking.

It is also incorrect to say that we ignore the sform and qform.  We in fact always take into account the sign of the determinant, which determines whether it is a right-handed or left-handed coordinate system.  If it is different from the templates (which are the FSL "native" handedness, or what we have also called "radiological" storage) then we take this into account in *all* of the FSL tools.

What is absolutely crucial is that all users check is that the original images that they are using and *labelled* correctly - including for left and right.  This ensures that the sform/qform information is correct.  This can be checked by looking at the labels in FSLView (and is best if there is a marker, like a vitamin capsule, so that left and right can be distinguished by simply looking at the image).

If the labelling is correct then we are *extremely* confident that FSL will not flip left and right at any point in any tool in our pipelines.  If it is not correct then it needs to fixed at this point and *no* analysis should be done using these images until the labels are fixed.  I would like all users of FSL to understand this and know that as long as the labels are correct then everything will work fine and that we have put a lot of effort into ensuring that this is true.

The fact that the templates use a negative determinant matrix is not important as we can deal just as happily with a positive determinant version.  We have carefully checked this, as I've said above.  The statement that the templates "tend to be left-right reversed from orthogonal space" isn't accurate.  There is no such thing as a standard "orthogonal space", although maybe you are referring to the x,y,z (mm) NIfTI coordinate system (which is an arbitrary choice, but at least a standardised one).  It is true that the voxel coordinates space of these template images is different in left-right orientation, but this is exactly what the sform and qform are there to give information about.  And because we use the information from them in *all* tools and have checked all the combinations of handedness and orientation *very carefully* then we are *extremely* confident that everything works correctly in FSL.

I would like to reassure all users that flipping is not going to happen, not in non-linear registration and not in any other case (with the one exception of fslswapdim which can deliberately do this but because of that we strongly discourage people from using it - they can use fslreorient2std instead which will never swap left-right).

I hope this is clear and reassures everyone about the status of left-right flipping and FSL.

All the best,
	Mark



On 20 Aug 2011, at 07:20, Christine Zakrzewski wrote:

> Most of the FSL tools ignore the NIfTI spatial transforms (both QForm and SForm). Additionally, the templates included with FSL tend to be left-right reversed from orthogonal space (ie, the template matrix is -2 0 0; 0 2 0; 0 0 2 instead of 2 0 0; 0 2 0; 0 0 2). Therefore, you need to be very careful when using FSL for normalization. I would ensure the images are not flipped during the non-linear registration. 
> 
> 
>>>> Morten Bruvold <[log in to unmask]> 08/19/11 9:54 AM >>>
> Hi, I receive this error message when trying to run randomise on tbss_sym data from the tool "Testing left vs. right in TBSS":
> randomise -i all_FA_skeletonised_left_minus_reight.nii.gz -o randomiseLRdiff -1 -v 5 -T
> 
> ERROR: Program failed
> 
> An exception has been thrown
> Data mask is blank.
> 
> Exiting
> 
> I tried first dcm2nii and then MRIconvert for conversion of data to nifti. Both give the same error. When viewing the mean_FA_skeleton_mask i can see the proper mask image.
> Do anyone have a clue about what could be wrong?
> Regards,
> Morten
> 
> 
> The information in this transmission is intended for official use of the Kessler Foundation.  It is intended for the exclusive use of the persons or entities to which it is addressed.  If you are not an intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this transmission to an intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is strictly prohibited.  If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the material from any computer.
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager