OK that sounds good to me. I'll still be on a lookout for a third option.
On 03/07/2011 21:32, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Cantor," == Cantor, Scott E<[log in to unmask]> writes:
> Cantor,> At least in the web case, we have not managed to come up with any. It's
> Cantor,> technically easy (you visit a URL), but we have no way to make the URL
> Cantor,> known.
>
> Right. we have neither found a solution that avoids this requirement
> nor a way to meet this requirement. Unless you can get under a certain
> threshhold of bad associations, which I don't think we can do, reducing
> bad associations doesn't seem to me like it will help much.
>
> My conclusion from this is to suggest to the UI people that they go
> forward with what they think is best, with the understanding we'll
> probably be back for a round 2.
|