On 19/07/11 19:38, Sam Hartman wrote:
> The identity constraint is in fact just the NAI.
>
> Sorry for lack of clarity.
>
> Let's do glob for now.
Ok.
> We can introduce a new format if we need regexps or we can do extended
> globs {foo,[log in to unmask] The easiest way for us to do extended globs in
> glib is to write a regexp to turn an extended glob into a regexp and use
> regexp matching under the covers.
Sounds like a good idea to enable extensibility. I think that inventing
your own language may not be the greatest of ideas but if you anticipate
that much flexibility won't be needed it sounds good enough.
> However none of that is necessary; I think simple globs will be fine
> now.
> --Sam
|