JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  July 2011

DIS-FORUM July 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Reasonable adjustments versus unfair advantage

From:

John Conway <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

John Conway <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:50:32 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (104 lines)

On a similar theme, would allowing someone with mental health issues sit resit exams at a special extra session rather than waiting 12 months like everyone else be appropriate? The exam officer is querying why we should do this specially

Sent from my iPhone

On 8 Jul 2011, at 14:41, "Penny Georgiou" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

Dear Jayne,

It would seem to me that your Academic needs to work a little harder than to simply 'query whether ' and invoke the cliché of  'unfair advantage'. Are they making a statement that they are prepared to stand by. saying something when they are simply inducing you to doubt in your process and your belief that it is reasonable adjustment. Clever tactics do not truth make. If there is a serious point of academic integrity being breached, and there may well be, it is for your Academic to put forward the case that would convince you of it; not the other way around.

Kind regards,

Penny Georgiou
Access 1st





On 8 July 2011 13:41, Jayne Mayers <<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Dear Colleagues

Our team recently  discussed how the institution could support a
student's progression to her third year. One of the options was that she
be permitted extra time to complete her work for the third year - it's
likely that she will not complete all work within the one year period,
because of limitations on the amount of time she is able to spend at her
studies.  She has several co-morbid medical conditions/impairments, one
of which is musculo-skeletal and has been diagnosed within the last six
months - SFE have kindly agreed a top-up Needs Assessment for her.

SFE have also provided us with the relevant extract of the regulations
which show that this is a reasonable adjustment.

 However, one of the senior academics has queried whether this student
is now being given an unfair advantage because they have an extended
period to complete.   A "level playing field" has been mentioned!

Any thoughts or experiences to share?

I have a meeting with the Academic on Monday morning so any responses
gratefully appreciated!  Although I realise Friday pm has to be the
worst time to ask a question!

Many thanks

Jayne

Jayne Mayers
Inclusion Officer
Student Information Centre
Edge Hill University
St Helens Road
Ormskirk
L39 4QP

Direct Dial 01695 584190 / 01695 584793
Extension 4190/4793
Or email <mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> (
mailto:<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> )




Based on an award-winning 160-acre Campus near Liverpool, Edge Hill
University has over 125 years of history as an innovative, successful
and distinctive higher education provider.

• Shortlisted for Times Higher Education University of the Year 2007 and
2010
• Top in the North West for overall student satisfaction (Sunday Times
University Guide 2011)
• Second in England for graduate employment (HESA 2009, full
universities, full and part-time, first and foundation degrees)
• Top 20 position, and the highest ranked university in 'The Sunday
Times Best Places to Work in the Public Sector 2010'
• Grade 1 'outstanding' judgements made in all 33 inspection cells,
Ofsted Initial Teacher Education inspection report 12/5/2011
-----------------------------------------------------
This message is private and confidential. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender and remove it from your
system. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Edge Hill or associated
companies.  Edge Hill University may monitor email traffic data and also
the content of email for the purposes of security and business
communications during staff absence.

-----------------------------------------------------



--
Penny Georgiou
Access 1st
Needs Assessment, Advice and Support Services
For Disabled Students in Higher Education
Direct: 020 7799 4803
Mobile: 07708 791 880
Fax: 020 7152 4001

5th Floor, 50, Broadway, St James's Park, London, SW1H 0GR
<http://www.access-1st.co.uk/>http://www.Access-1st.co.uk
Registered Office: 9 Dartmouth Street, London, SW1H 9BL

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager