Podding! I still prefer clay tablets although the sun dried is liable to water damage
P old clayman!
-----Original Message-----
From: British & Irish poets [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Lace
Sent: 15 July 2011 10:19
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: "Why POD is fine with me"
POD is meant to be cheaper for the publisher I hear, rather than doing so many print runs of a book that might sit on a shelf for years with no customers. It makes sense to use POD for poetry in my view. But then again some publisher like the more traditional approach.
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:30:23 +0100
> From: Alec Newman <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: "Why POD is fine with me"
> To: [log in to unmask]
>I'm afraid I've only really known POD as a medium for new poetry. So, I have no opinion about the prestige of it. All I know is, as someone who only became aware of new poetry in the 90s, the shitter a book is made, the more I'm likely to love the poetry. The first Sheppard I bought literally shed it's pages on the floor the first time I read it.
alec
> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:47:23 +0100
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: "Why POD is fine with me"
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> http://adamfieled.blogspot.com/2008/11/why-pod-is-fine-with-me.html
|