Hi Peter,
It looks like Apel hasn't updated yet for June. It seems to be somewhat sluggish. It's fine for previous months so it will probably be OK eventually. Anyway we're probably going to stop using it and use the Production HS06 anyway.
Cheers
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Steve Lloyd Queen Mary, University of London +
+ E-mail: [log in to unmask] School of Physics +
+ Phone: +44-(0)20-7882-5057 Mile End Road +
+ Fax: +44-(0)20-8981-9465 London E1 4NS, UK +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:07, Peter Grandi wrote:
> In the usual metrics prototype page:
>
> http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~lloyd/gridpp/metrics.html
>
> Durham does not get points for production because the HS6 factor
> for that is missing. Looking at the HS factor page:
>
> http://pprc.qmul.ac.uk/~lloyd/gridpp/hs06.html
>
> the BDII reported value is right, what is missing is the APEL
> reported value for HS06. But the APEL reported CPU time is
> there, so it is perplexing.
>
> Unless the APEL value that matters is that for analysis jobs
> even for production CPU scaling, which is missing because we
> don't do those (yet).
>
> Where can I look or what can I do?
|