JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FISH Archives


FISH Archives

FISH Archives


FISH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FISH Home

FISH Home

FISH  June 2011

FISH June 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: MIDAS Heritage inconsistency?

From:

Nick Boldrini <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The Forum for Information Standards in Heritage (FISH)

Date:

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:21:31 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Hi Ed



looks like its just thee and me on the list atm



anyway, have I done all I need all I need to do for this to be raised and looked at by the MIDAS Heritage editing group (if one exists??)



IF so job done on that score.



What I would be interested in, then, is what was thought by the HER Compliance group as to what this would include, if any of them are on FISH?



thanks



best wishes



Nick Boldrini



Historic Environment Record Officer

Durham County Council

Tel: 0191 3708840

Fax: 0191 3708897

[log in to unmask]



-----Original Message-----

From: The Forum for Information Standards in Heritage (FISH) [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Edmund Lee

Sent: 16 June 2011 14:19

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [FISH] MIDAS Heritage inconsistency?



Hello Nick,



I'll defer to those who have considered this more recently, but yes - I think that's an inconsistency in MIDAS Heritage. Dimension, as described in the Dictionary of units is intended for use with physical and spatial units, to indicate what it is that is being measured. This allows MIDAS Heritage to avoid having lots of separate Units for all the different things that are likely to get measuerd in heritage data (weight, area, electrical resistance etc etc). For Date and Period information it's not so clear, and I think the text of the Information Group may need further attention. The example in the Information Group text uses 'duration' for what might go into Dimension; that is, that the number of recorded years refers to the duration of a particular phase or activity. But that is a bit tenuous, and as you say contradicts the text fo the Dictionary.



Any other thoughts on this folks? FISH has in place a mechanism for issuing corrections, so don't feel its carved in stone.



On the what to record issue - bear in mind that the HER Compliance trumps MIDAS Heritage if it makes something more restrictive (i.e. something the HER community have decided is mandatory, but MIDAS Heritage is optional) but NOT the other way round.



Hope this helps,



Ed

English Heritage





Help protect our environment by only printing this email if absolutely necessary. The information it contains and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only intended for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may be unlawful for you to use, share or copy the information, if you are not authorised to do so. If you receive this email by mistake, please inform the person who sent it at the above address and then delete the email from your system. Durham County Council takes reasonable precautions to ensure that its emails are virus free. However, we do not accept responsibility for any losses incurred as a result of viruses we might transmit and recommend that you should use your own virus checking procedures.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
February 2024
December 2023
September 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
August 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
October 2020
September 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
July 2016
June 2016
February 2016
January 2016
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
October 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager