Thanks, doug.
And might flick that that - I often have that debates.
Cheers,
Jill
________________________
Jill Jones
www.jilljones.com.au
On Thu May 12 1:50 , Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> sent:
>It works both linguistically, Jill. (Do you need the 'that' in the 3rd line?)
>
>Doug
>
>
>On 2011-05-11, at 7:43 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
>> Loss and Gain
>
>Douglas Barbour
>[log in to unmask]
>
>http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
>http://eclecticruckus.wordpress.com/
>
>Latest books:
>Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
>http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp\?LID=41&bookID=664
>Wednesdays'
>http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
>
>Just a late night pilgrim
>Looking for redemption in the underground.
>Lord, won't you help a late night pilgrim
>When the morning comes around.
>
> Tift Merritt
|