Where do you think the accountability for the incompetence would lie?
With the people who procured the service, or the individuals/organisations
who did not understand the fact that individuals move posts within the NHS -
and their job functions do not always move with them?
i.e. that an NHSMail address serves a different function to a gmail one?
Mary Hawking
-----Original Message-----
From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Russell Brown
Sent: 24 May 2011 06:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: NHS.Net between jobs?
I tend to think incompetence is more likely than malevolence.
Many/most don't have the wherewithal for the latter.
Russell
Sent from my phone, which may be an iPhone.
On 24 May 2011, at 06:40, Mary Hawking <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Motivation i.e. intentional sabotage, or lack of understanding of the
> business i.e. in this case the NHS?
>
>
> Mary Hawking
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Adrian Midgley
> Sent: 23 May 2011 22:44
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: NHS.Net between jobs?
>
> On 23 May 2011 21:29, Walter Tim (FALKLAND SURGERY) <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>> All I know is that it definitely DOESN'T work for staff moving between
> practices like out Deputy PM who recently took not only her name and
ongoing
> email with her to her new job as PM elsewhere, but also all her archived
> email messages relating to the practice
>
> An excellent example of why each person needs a personal email address
> and each job needs an email address and what changes is the mapping of
> persons to the latter set.
>
> It was obvious to the people who described the first @nhs.uk email
> system, and the people who described how the new one was to work.
>
> SO what was the motivation of the people who sabotaged it?
>
> --
> Adrian Midgley http://www.defoam.net/
|